railway692

If you look at the point of an island and your first thought is ‘that’s a naked leg’, you have a leg kink.

No judgment.

But that’s what you are.

What was the rationale for triple legs?

Were the flag designers secretly leg fetishists or were they out and proud?

Lmao. I got curious and looked through your user posts, too.

Howdy, internet neighbor!

I agree that it’s a skill, but I think the point is that it’s a skill with a very low ceiling compared to art.

Like being able to use a coffee machine.

But he did, though.

I thought that was the whole point of him bringing it up.

He said, we have tools (like magic lasso) that let you skip the boring part of art, so you can get to the creative part. AI can be like that; a tool that let’s you skip having to do backgrounds so you can focus on flying rat monstrosities.

He doesn’t use it that way, but he acknowledges that you can.

It’s just that most AI “art” usage is skipping putting in creative effort at all.

What is happening in the third panel?

I asked if it was literally true (as in proven, documented, a known fact).

Not if he was very probably, highly likely, the most suspicious ever, the first person you would point at if anyone asked who in this room fucked someone underage.

Yes, he should be behind bars and investigated.

No, as far as we know, it’s not literally true. (Probably true, though.)

The books and furniture in this House were not made out of Stone. 7/10

Is this a commentary on that Stephen King movie?

There’s plenty of solid arguments we could make against him, especially about his predatory behavior, but I don’t think this should be one of them.

The claim is muddy at best.

And if a fence-sitter actually follows up on it, this is the kind of thing that could be used as an excuse for them to go full-MAGA.

Recent claims that new documents prove the validity of the Johnson claims are false, because these documents are from 2016 and have nothing to do with what have become known as the “Epstein docs.”

Viral claims that Trump has a history of sexually assaulting children first emerged with the Johnson lawsuits in 2016. Pictures of court documents related to the case have lent perceived credibility to additional unsourced claims of child abuse that followed, and memes frequently combine the two claims.

Such claims are not new, come with several red flags and originated with an aggressive push by a serial fabulist.

Is this literally true?

I know he’s been a creep forever (and a felon, and a racist, and…), but I don’t remember literal statutory rape.