• peteyestee@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    How many fakes are in the crowd manipulating the situation for the oppositions political gain?

  • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Doesn’t trump lose horribly every time he goes after CA?

    He’d have better luck waiting for something to go down in the Midwest, but yeah, w/e good luck.

    • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      There is no challenging the military as the citizenry. This is terrible advice.

      What we should be doing is encouraging insubordination by service members. Why the fuck would you agree to use military force against your fellow Americans, on American soil? Not only is that unconstitutional, it’s simply not what you signed up for. Say no

      • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, and most of South America would disagree with you.

        Anyway. GovCo can’t win anyway. Not even in open hot war. They don’t have the numbers.

        Military and Natl Guard combined are less than 3,000,000 people. And that includes the logistics that makes it all work. They couldn’t handle Afghanistan and its <50,000,000 people.

        • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          You overestimate how willing people are to throw their bodies at the problem. Things have to be so bad that they expect to die anyway. Otherwise, your militia sign-ups will be limited to only those most brave, ideological, or stupid.

          You also underestimate how much more effective military training and ordinances are among the US military vs militias. If they really wanted to mow down civilians, it would be fish in a barrel, even if everyone in the militia is armed.

          This is why the hope is that US service men are committed to the constitution and not to Drumpf’s orders. It’s a thin hope.

          • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            They’re committed to the paycheck. Don’t be naive. Do you think American soldiers are uniquely unable to carry out atrocities? That sweet salty buttery baby jesus is gonna reach down, touch their hearts and make them defy orders? I’ll refer you to uh, the last 25 years of action in the middle east.

            This empire is dying live on TV. And all of them so far have ended bloody. We won’t be the exception.

            • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I did say it was a thin hope (well I said ‘thing’ but I’ve corrected it now).

              But I think you give your service men too little credit. Even the police. How many fatalities or even serious injuries have actually occurred during protest activities? These a generally not people who want to kill anyone, particularly not their American brothers and sisters. But when one side dehumanizes the other, all bets are off. If things actually become life threatening, then everything changes. Kill or be killed.

              • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’m happy to be surprised. But I have set my expectations appropriately low.

                I expect some inciting event over the summer. Someone gets killed by the feds and those protests really do turn into real riots. Then the clown prince will escalate. Open war by Christmas.

                Like I said. I’m happy to be proven wrong. I would be delighted to be proven wrong. Maybe we’ll luck out and he’ll have a stroke mid ramble or maybe some general will shoot the bastard during his military parade. But I don’t think we’re that lucky.

                Another possible is a general strike. That Union leader they black bagged earlier this week. He hasn’t been released yet. If they try to deport him on some trumped up bullshit that’s gonna have an apocalyptic backlash from basically every union except the police union.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Most states have a token State Guard that answers only to their governor, not the federal government. If Trump keeps this shit up, states are going to start disbanding their National Guard units, and shifting them into State control.

        • CircaV@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Except Trunp federalized the California state force, bypassing Newsome, that’s a pretty big problem. Newsome is suing Trunp. In the meantime - violence on citizens by cops and Trunp-allied forces continues.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Except Trunp federalized the California state force

            No, he did not. He federalized the California National guard. The State Guard is a lesser-known organization that answers solely to the Governor. They cannot be federalized. Which is why we’re probably going to be seeing states putting more of their resources into their State Guards and less into their National Guard units.

            As for the CA National Guard: Article I, Section 8, Clause 16. The State retains the sole authority to appoint the officers of the Militia.

            10 USC 246. The National Guard is the Militia.

            Newsom has the authority to appoint the officers of the National Guard. Revoking the appointments of the Commissioned and Non-Commissioned officers of the California National Guard, he effectively disbands the organization.

            Trump has no authority to override Newsom’s authority here.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        There is no challenging the military as the citizenry

        Says someone from the nation that mainly loses military conflicts with the citizenry…

    • pleasegoaway@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Gavin Newson specifically said that he did not ask for or need the 2,000 troops and that sending to LA would only make things worse.

      Sooo, there’s that.

      • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Legally I believe the National Guard must be mobilized for a legal reason and until Trump has identified an actual cause, he cannot mobilize them himself. So Newson should just order them to stand down.

        Newson hasn’t done that though.

        • sthetic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          “oh, Trump wouldn’t do that, it’s illegal”

          Phew, what a relief!

          Also, when Trump does illegal stuff, people tend to allow it and obey him. If they try to shut him down using the legal system, he goes ahead and does it anyway.

          I kind of just roll my eyes when someone says, “Aha, it’s illegal! He can’t do that!” We don’t really live in that world anymore.

          • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            My emphasis was more on Newsom not ordering them to stand down. They’re under his command until a legal order from the POTUS supercedes his command.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Distraction or not, Trump is a coward who thinks deploying soldiers at a protest will make him look tough. It doesn’t. It makes him look scared and pathetic.

    • ShoeThrower@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Of all the things you could rightly criticize as cowardly actions, brazenly deploying a military force against a civilian population, is not among them.

    • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s because he is. Him and most of his cronies are at a point where if they do not maintain power until they die, they may face extreme consequences.

      The good thing is I guess they know that. The bad thing is, when it’s that or maintain power, what lengths will they go to?

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Funny how he doesn’t hesitate here, but when Congress was literally in danger of being fucking lynched on Jan 6, he didn’t do shit.

    • arrow74@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      But you dont understand one protestor littered , meaning that it is now an illegal gathering and that the thousands of people gathered are a violent mob.

      Very convenient

      • Ice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Having seen a couple of vids from folks on the ground it seemed akin to a proper French riot. Folks lobbing bricks, makeshift barricades, vehicles burning etc.

        Yeah folks may feel justified an upset but it isn’t exactly surprising when authorities crack down to restore order in such a situation.

          • Ice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            How do you mean? Most authoritarian regimes are maintained with fear and violence. Even in democratic states that don’t primarily rule through fear the government generally has a monopoly on using violence to enforce the law.

          • Ice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Sure they can, that’s called a revolution - in that case those who caused the disorder get called “heroes” and “freedom fighters”.

            If they get smushed by the current authorities coming back in force, then they get written into the history books as “criminals”, “rebels” or “insurrectionists”.

            Winner writes history and all that.

            • ShoeThrower@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              People don’t just instantly forget the moment after an event ends, especially now.

              The point I was making, is that bringing in cops and the national guard to beat protesters does not restore order to a crisis caused by ICE kidnapping people. It is an escalation that will very likely be matched if CA hasn’t totally forgotten their past. Which they haven’t.

              • Ice@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Read up on the '92 LA riots. Do you think US authorities are willing to use more, or less force today than then? Do you think LA civilians today have a larger, or lesser capacity for violence?

                Thankfully I don’t think US authorities are anywhere close to PRC or Russia levels of force usage against civilians, but I would bet on the badges coming out on top if it came to a chicken race. That’s not to say it wouldn’t get ugly.

                • ShoeThrower@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  What you’re not understanding is that quashing a protest with force doesn’t make the anger just go away.

                  Thankfully I don’t think US authorities are anywhere close to PRC or Russia levels of force

                  The US is only trying to end Habeas Corpus, cracking down on free speech, personal and social freedoms, deploying military units in the streets, planting secret police in protests, and is currently kidnapping, disappearing, and sending people to foreign labor camps without trial while wearing masks and not giving any identifiable information… All while supporting and funding an ongoing internationally-recognized genocide.

                  Maybe you should be doing the reading…

    • ShoeThrower@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      There’s also a part that says freedom of speech, right to a fair trial, freedom from unreasonable search & seizures, right to asylum…

      How’s that going?

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Repeat after me: A government that is bluntly sending weapon to bomb kids have no concern of it is own citizen.

    Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.

      • CircaV@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Probably the most likely scenario - do ppl remember during COVID & BLM how parts of Portland were reclaimed for a time? There were lots of spontaneous mini-riots all over the place but Trump didn’t declare martial law. Will he this time? Will these protests spread? Is Trump gonna way over react this early, setting off more and more protests?? Is this the start?

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      There would probably be no consequences for him, but the “martial law” would probably be ignored and not happen.

      As I understand it, in the US, martial law can only legally happen if the courts are unable to function. Basically, if things are so bad courts are unable to judge people, you let the military judge them.

      • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The law hasn’t mattered so far. It is illegal for him to deploy the National Guard without the governor’s consent, which was not given. Not only was it now given, but Trump went out of his way to denounce the governor while illegally deploying the National Guard.

        The US is no longer operating within the constitution, it is operating under the appearance of one, an appearance that falls apart the closer you look at it.

        • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          What you say and what I say don’t contradict. ICE is already acting as if martial law was declared, ignoring due process/habeas corpus. If Trump declared martial law, those that still follow laws, constitution and the courts would keep doing so and those that follow Trumps orders above all would also keep doing so. There would be no substantial change.

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not actually surprised that the second american civil war starts in California. Cali always seemed like the most progressive state.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    2000 Guardsmen. For a city of 3 million. And a governor who doesn’t want them there. Sure. Good luck with that.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    They’ve been salivating for an opportunity like this. I bet they thought it would have happened already