• Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s got most of the same issues as eugenics - yeah, it’d be nice if nobody had to suffer obvious and objective genetic diseases but it consistently immediately turns into “well but I think being a red head is a genetic disease”. You have to consider how a solution can be achieved to really weigh its benefit versus alternatives.

    We can feed everybody by Luigi-ing a rounding error’s worth of billionaires. Or we can reduce global population by a factor of 10, which is almost certainly going to disproportionately favor rich white dudes, do nothing to that handful of sociopaths, and they’ll still burn the planet to the ground.

    • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ok but I never said anything about eugenics or a specific peoples. I said “we should have less people.” And everyone got upset assuming I want to genocide the undesirables.

      I literally just don’t think we need 8 billion people. In no way did I suggest that we do it in a specific way or targeting specific people. Just a general 25-40% reduction in population over a few generations.

      Literally all that needs to happen is more birth control for everyone. Not forced.

      Idk why everyone gets so incensed by this.

      • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The issue is people have gone down this line of thinking dozens of times and it always ends the same way. Your inability to see that is how we get there.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Population is dropping in developed countries. Nothing needs to be done but let nature take its course. That’s not anyone deciding anything.