• Ideonek@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Turns out the test is only a good predictor of “how well you can trust the adults in your life to keep their words”. Which tells more about the envirement than about the kid.

  • 0101100101@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This experiment was not specifically about whether a kid would wait for the second marshmellow or not (which would be delayed by 20+ minutes), nor whether they would play with the roomful of toys, but to see how they grew up. The real test was to catch up with the adults and see how ‘successful’ they’d become. The experimenters found that those children who waited for the second marshmellow achieved higher grades and had more ‘successful’ better-paying careers.

    It’s the concept of delayed rewards vs immediate rewards and is prevalent in the world of machine learning.

    • rapchee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      later replications of the test showed that the difference between kids waiting or not, and successful or not was significantly related to their parents financial status, in other words, the broke kids ate the stuff that was in front of them, because they learned that promises are not always kept