A community rule to tag the artist in the title would make it possible to filter by keyword. Seems like a pretty reasonable rule to put in place, imo, if only for attribution purposes even.
It’s a comedy strip, and humour is extremely subjective. What works for one person won’t work for someone else.
It’s also very intentionally a “bad taste” comic by design, and as someone who never enjoyed Happy Tree Friends or other franchises which use violence, sex or toilet humour as cornerstones, it’s already on an uphill battle as far as my tastes are concerned.
Of course, dark humour and “bad taste” have been cornerstones of human comedy since forever, and I don’t mind them when it serves a purpose. But Cyanide and Happiness seems to exist purely on bad taste, as if bad taste is entertaining in it’s own right.
To me it feels completly insubstantial, and so for my taste, it’s a pass.
That’s fair. I keep their website bookmarked but sometimes I wonder why I bother to check it at all. I think my sense of humor was a bit simpler 10 years ago.
I like c/comicstrips but I wish there was a way to exclude certain artists whose sense of humour is incompatible with mine.
I never want to see this artist nor cyanide and happiness ever again, if I can help it.
I would like to make a rule so op here only gets cyanide and happiness and oop’s comics on Lemmy ever
A community rule to tag the artist in the title would make it possible to filter by keyword. Seems like a pretty reasonable rule to put in place, imo, if only for attribution purposes even.
It’s a pitty. I love Extrafabulous comics. And I was thinking people would like it here. Even so his humour could be kinda weird. 😇
…I love it and think your OP has an extremely long stick up his butt lol
I’m sure lots of people here do and will like it - just not me! :)
You should keep posting it, obviously.
Maybe this community can start putting the artist/source in the post title. Unless that becomes a rule I doubt that would happen though.
What don’t you like about C&H?
It’s a comedy strip, and humour is extremely subjective. What works for one person won’t work for someone else.
It’s also very intentionally a “bad taste” comic by design, and as someone who never enjoyed Happy Tree Friends or other franchises which use violence, sex or toilet humour as cornerstones, it’s already on an uphill battle as far as my tastes are concerned.
Of course, dark humour and “bad taste” have been cornerstones of human comedy since forever, and I don’t mind them when it serves a purpose. But Cyanide and Happiness seems to exist purely on bad taste, as if bad taste is entertaining in it’s own right.
To me it feels completly insubstantial, and so for my taste, it’s a pass.
That’s fair. I keep their website bookmarked but sometimes I wonder why I bother to check it at all. I think my sense of humor was a bit simpler 10 years ago.
C&H had some hits years ago but yeah it does seem like they have to keep jumping the shark to stay relevant and it’s a miss so so so often.
That said I’d take 10 bad C&H over another bluejayoo
The real problem with Cyanide and Happiness is that it’s just a shadow of Rob DenBleyker’s former greatness… Joe Zombie!