• ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’ve been wondering the same thing.

    It’s a baller thing to say. But if they’ve lost air superiority (or even if it’s compromised) then it doesn’t mean much.

    • Substance_P@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I read somewhere that Iran can close the strait without a full-scale naval engagement using selective drone strikes and harassing vessels, Iran triggers a spike in maritime insurance premiums which will choke shipping companies. Also because of the narrow width of the strait, also shallow, Iran can use mines, they have both simple contact mines to sophisticated “smart” mines, apparently they possesses one of the largest naval mine inventories in the world.

      • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Those are fair points. They don’t need to block all targeted traffic. They just have to be enough of a threat/pain in the ass for transportation and insurance rates to go up to an uncomfortable level. It’s all about threat and perception.

        Sure, the US air force and navy could bomb the shit out of their artillery placements. But given how (relatively) cheap and effective drones are, that might not be as effective as it seems at first.

      • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They’re a petrostate with a hopelessly outdated air force, the US or any other developed country can destroy their infrastructure at their leisure and bring their economy to it’s knees. Which they would happily do if Iran sinks a vessel flagged in their waters.

        They also need a working vessel to lay those mines.