• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yeah they had pretty good runs, democratic constitution held strong in the US for 250 years. UK is a monarchy, same as ever.

    China and NK democracy failed on basically Day 1, USSR only did a little better.

    • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      UK is a monarchy, same as ever

      Nothing to do with authoritarianism.

      China and NK democracy failed on basically Day 1, USSR only did a little better.

      They were never democracies to begin with.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Having an absolute ruler kind of has everything to do with authoritarianism. The UK is flawed to a frightening degree, always has been, that’s why it’s so out of place and left behind by the rest of Europe.

        • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          The UK’s king is not an absolute ruler.

          Same with Norway, Denmark, Sweden, or the Netherlands - all of which are monarchies, but also 100% democracies, without the “let’s ID check everyone trying to access the Internet and block their VPNs” vibe that UK recently acquired.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 days ago

            Lol OK, sorry, it’s a constitutional democracy whose parliament is given authority by an absolute ruler. Still pretty shit and I strongly support any movement to do away with monarchs permanently.