• Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve always thought either were silly - it implies that ‘white’ isn’t a color. Even if you say ‘white is the absence of color’ that itself is a color.

      ‘hey Bill, what did you paint your fence as’ ‘I painted it not a color’ ‘ah, quite basic, no?’

      • teslekova@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        The absence of colour is not a colour.

        That said, white people are generally actually various shades of pinky beige, black people are generally various shades of brown, but our language uses colour-based terminology to refer to ethnicity anyway.

        Complaining that white is a colour, so whites should be included as coloured people, is kind of silly in that context.

        Especially if you remember that the term “coloured people” originated as a way to stop people who had black and white heritage from getting any of the benefits of their whiteness.

        • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 hours ago

          It’s not ‘I want to be included too’ but like, the entire thing is silly. We are all some shade of a color. To single out a group and call them ‘colored’ when we literally all are is just, wat.

          I mean it’s not like the people who were at the helm of racism were particularly intelligent, but like come on. It’s almost comical how smooth-brained they were (are). If I pulled out a pack of crayons and pointed to the white one, their worldview may implode.

          • teslekova@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I definitely agree that the whole racism thing is absolutely stupid. A whole kingdom of cruelties based on nothing important.