cm0002@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 13 days agoTo innovate is human.lemmy.mlimagemessage-square52linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageTo innovate is human.lemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 13 days agomessage-square52linkfedilink
minus-squaretazeycrazy@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·13 days agoThe best programmers are the lazy. However AI probably will kill this statement with vibe coding.
minus-squareFuglyDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·13 days agoI… wouldn’t call AI an innovation… lol. I’m sure somebody is using it somewhere for something useful, but 95% of it- including vibe coding- is… laughable. (and honestly more work.)
minus-squaretazeycrazy@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·13 days agoI was more implying that lazy coders are going to use vibe coding rather than object oriented programming. So we will need sort of not lazy programmers but not the kind that is eager to support 3 different JSON injest scripts.
minus-squarehowrar@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·12 days ago“The best programmers are lazy” does not imply that the lazy are the best programmers. I think it’s still true with the existence of vibe coding.
The best programmers are the lazy. However AI probably will kill this statement with vibe coding.
I… wouldn’t call AI an innovation… lol.
I’m sure somebody is using it somewhere for something useful, but 95% of it- including vibe coding- is… laughable. (and honestly more work.)
I was more implying that lazy coders are going to use vibe coding rather than object oriented programming. So we will need sort of not lazy programmers but not the kind that is eager to support 3 different JSON injest scripts.
“The best programmers are lazy” does not imply that the lazy are the best programmers. I think it’s still true with the existence of vibe coding.