• WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    One caveat. You do get dinged on your credit score if you are too responsible with your credit. You get dinged if you don’t carry a balance on your credit card. Credit reports ultimately rate how profitable you are to lenders, not how responsible you are with credit.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      One caveat. You do get dinged on your credit score if you are too responsible with your credit.

      Untrue. I’m in the 800s, and all I did was consistently pay off my everyday-use credit cards every month.

      You get dinged if you don’t carry a balance on your credit card.

      Absolutely false:

      Carrying a balance on a credit card to improve your credit score has been proven as a myth. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau says paying off your credit cards in full each month is the best way to improve your credit score and maintain excellent credit for the long haul.

      Credit reports ultimately rate how profitable you are to lenders

      No they don’t, or else I, who has literally only profited off my credit cards via the combination of never paying interest, and utilizing cash back rewards from regular use, wouldn’t have a credit score in the 800s.

      not how responsible you are with credit.

      Explain my 800s score, then. They’re making literally negative profit from me.

      If someone has one credit card that’s always maxed out, and while they’re always making payments on time, they’re minimum payments, so they’re accruing essentially the most interest they could possibly be accruing, I guarantee that person’s credit score is much worse than mine, even though there is no arguing that this hypothetical person generates way more revenue for the credit card provider. That refutes your assertion from the other direction.

      And that’s without even mentioning how significant a negative influence 100% utilization has on the score.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        No, you are incorrect.

        This is a screenshot directly from a credit report disclosure from a current mortgage application. This type of credit report is much more accurate than the ones you get from a free site, as they are the version of the credit report actually used by a mortgage lender.

        I do the same strategy you do. We don’t carry a balance on our cards. Usually the only debt we have is our mortgage. And yet, clear as day, the credit report disclosure clearly indicates that our score took a hit because we don’t carry a balance. I also have a plus 800 credit score, but it would be higher if I made a habit of paying the bank lots of interest income.

        • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          the credit report disclosure clearly indicates that our score took a hit because we don’t carry a balance.

          Are you paying your cards off before the statement cycle ends, resulting in your statement reading $0 every month? “No recent revolving balances” means that, as far as the credit reporting agencies know, you haven’t been using your card at all for 3+ months (emphasis added)[1]:

          “No recent revolving balances”—another way to say your credit cards are all paid off—sometimes appears as a FICO® Score risk factor. To be included in a credit score calculation, accounts need to show activity over time. By making a small purchase each month and then paying the balance in full, you will demonstrate that you are a good credit risk. The balance on your billing statement is what is usually shown in your credit report. Even though you’ve paid the balance in full, your credit report would show the balance, indicating activity in your account and helping your score.

          You should let the statement cycle end with the balance of whatever you used it for, and then pay it off, anytime between that day and your due date. As long as you pay it off no later than your due date, you’ll still pay no interest, but paying it off before the statement ends prevents the agencies from even realizing that you used the card at all, because the agencies can’t see your actual credit card usage activity. They see only:

          • statement balance
          • (if it’s nonzero) payment status
            • ‘did you pay at least the minimum?’
            • ‘did you pay on time/by the due date?’

          I also have a plus 800 credit score, but it would be higher if I made a habit of paying the bank lots of interest income.

          No, it wouldn’t. Interest paid is not a factor at all—the credit reporting agencies literally have no way of knowing what portion, if any, of your statement balance is interest, they’re only provided the bottom line total statement balance.

          Also, if you’re over 750, any further increase is ‘gravy’ anyway, almost no lender has a tier higher than that. The highest ‘breakpoint’ I’ve ever seen is 780. Even if what you said was accurate, ‘I’m over 800 but it could be higher’ is a distinction without a difference.


          1. And this is only an ‘adverse effect’ insofar as, after that amount of time, you start to be considered similarly someone who doesn’t have those credit cards at all, since as far as they know, you’re using them the same amount as such a person, lol. ↩︎