I think the second panel is meant to be the same woman given that their top is the same, the hair is the same length, albeit a darker shade, and in the third panel she is pointing towards the second panel.
I won’t argue about the second panel, even though it wouldn’t make sense story-wise for it to be the same character there, but in the third panel she’s very definitely pointing towards the fourth panel, not the second.
Yes, there are shitty pit bull owners out there.
No, not all pit bulls are aggressive, only non-neutered, poorly trained, or abused ones.
Yes, it’s weird how the comic uses an overweight woman to characterize bad dog owners but not the victims.
It also characterises “regular-weight men” as bad dog owners (second panel).
Yeah, let’s stop with the “skinny-girl victim” propaganda! Plus size women can be victims too!
I think the second panel is meant to be the same woman given that their top is the same, the hair is the same length, albeit a darker shade, and in the third panel she is pointing towards the second panel.
I won’t argue about the second panel, even though it wouldn’t make sense story-wise for it to be the same character there, but in the third panel she’s very definitely pointing towards the fourth panel, not the second.