• lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Let’s not both sides this. One side sought a diplomatic solution that had broad consensus it was effective, and also didn’t enable this escalation; the other dropped out without evidence and did enable said escalation.

      This video is also clipped out of context, obviously.

      For those who actually aren’t pushing a BoTh sIdEs agenda Here’s the clip in its entirety where you conveniently left out the part just before where she says, “the question was, ‘if Iran were to launch a nuclear attack on Israel, what would our response be?’”

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think she and the DNC’s establishment are pretty close in terms of polciy. I don’t think it’s as irrelevant as you think. Like I said in my other reply. Biden said during the campaign that he would rejoin the deal, but then no efforts were made to do so. Why?

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Biden

          Also largely irrelevant now that he stepped back but I’d say the reason it didn’t get done is it wasn’t important as the other things he was dealing with.

          The only reason we are talking about Iran right now is because Netanyahu attacked them to divert attention from their genocide in Gaza and now the right and elements of the left are following suit.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh wow a Democrat with an empty promise, what a novel concept. Somehow this is equivalent to actively destroying a deal designed to prevent Iran from making nukes and sparking armed conflict and potentially a war. bOtH sIdEeEeS!!