How nice of you to suppress yourselves in order to save the administration the effort of having to do so.

1. They don’t need infiltrators. They’ll just show images and videos of some other violent protest from years ago that happened somewhere else and claim it’s happening now. (like they’ve done before. I’m sure they already have the videos selected and ready to go.)
2. Videos of you beating the crap out of anyone talking violence will be shown without context and lied about who is being targeted to claim the protest is being violent.

It does not matter what you do, they will call you violent and treat you as such. I don’t know if Lemmy has an actual community for the extreme right MAGAs, but go look at the Reddit r/conservative community on any day and see how many posts are calling the current protest violent. Reality has a Liberal bias so they do not care what it says, they will listen chronic liars that tell them what they want to believe is true.

Once you use violence, they will use that to justify using violence and putting down the movement.

And surely the people who lie about everything wouldn’t lie about violence happening anyway to justify using violence…

This administration wants this.

This administration wants people not to resist them. Failing that people resisting them verbally but in no practical manner will do just fine.

No ID saying they are ICE, so they very well could be protestors! You have no way of knowing and feel threatened…

Is he trying to discourage people from voting for Biden?

If you’re just looking for reasons to dislike her then go circlejerk somewhere else

I’m not, but if we look back to the top of this comment chain, we see someone complaining that the comments won’t be about the comic but instead about how shitty a person the artist is for some reason.
We get a reply to that about how she has an OF, and then the comment you replied to:

I fail to understand why posting a pair of tits is such a controversial thing to do. Maybe I’m too European to lose my marbles over some nipples.

So one could be forgiven for assuming your response to that was part of the conversation about why it’s so controversial and the artist being a shitty person.

If you are in fact over here just “trying to talk about Internet security” then it sounds like you’ve taken a bizarre tangent from the topic at hand in order to circle jerk about your topic of choice.

not having 2FA set up as a public celebrity who is constantly being attacked is once again bad OPSEC.

Sure. But that sounds like her problem, not a reason for me to dislike her.

This sounds a lot like “there are duchbags attacking her because they are misogynists” which again, is not a good reason for other people to dislike her.

Yes, everyone should practice OPSEC, but a public “celebrity” who’s sole business is online doubly so.

She doesn’t practice OPSEC because she has an OF that exists? I am not nearly as aware of her OF as the people that don’t like her, so you’ll have to let me know if there’s something different she should be doing with it.

to determine whether friendly actions can be observed by enemy intelligence

I must be really out of the loop. What is her business that results in her having enemy intelligence? Is it being on OF that gets you enemy intelligence, or making comics?

She has children so she has to be a paragon of virtue?

Borrowers expect Trump to scale back or eliminate relief programs

“Why would Biden do this?”