Please explain how your comment makes sense? Your initial statement clarifications state that it is to imply possession.

The sentence currently starting this was “Bro he’s good friends with the Clinton’s too”

English has specific structures and forms, that are well laid out, even if confusing.

The usage there is referring to the Clinton family as a plural noun. There are no correct possessive uses in the original sentence.

The conjunctions you used clearly stated He Is and Clinton Is.

Someone else explained this before me. They’re all trying to point out that English used the way you’re using it doesn’t mean what you are trying to explain it to mean.

Your follow up statement currently reads “It’s not plural it’s possessive.”

To declare possessiveness you would have had to change words or clauses.

One example that reads similar to what you’re explaining could be: “Bro he’s the Clintons’ good friend.”

My position makes sense when you comprehend the rules behind what everyone else was getting at, and what I’m driving at.

You’ve been rude, and refused to acknowledge context. Your usage didn’t match the intent you expressed and wouldn’t clarify.

Read Rule # 3. I accused you of behavior of being like something else. It’s not the same as calling you that other thing.

You obviously think I have multiple accounts as you’ve accused me of such.

I walked in on a conversation with over 30 replies and most of them were you ignoring the context and providing content that was trying to walk all over a valid point without moving the conversation forward. Yeah - You failed to explain yourself and ignored context.

When everyone else thinks you’re wrong, perhaps - just perhaps - you could be wrong. Use a tool to look at all the folks who downvoted you. You’re not standing up for yourself. You’re standing up for incorrect usage, and you’re not following the rules.

Your entire exchange falls under rule 4 violations. Goodbye, I’ll follow the guidance. You’ve subtracted from the conversation.

Regardless of how you arrived here, your attitude is not vibing with 420 at all, not of late.

A normal human user would understand the context and respond appropriately.

I’m my own person, look at my post history.

I’m reading a thread and responding to someone thrashing irrationally due to their own error.

It sure reads like exchanges I’ve experienced with LLMs of late.

Confident incorrectness has been a characteristic of both of these instances.

I don’t have any other federated accounts, by any other name(s).

So - you’re still denying the fact that you used the apostrophe incorrectly? The other guy spelled it out for you, and tried to be nice it seems.

I’m about to give you a link about the proper usage, to reflect your prior posting attitude.

You’re being a dishonestly rude individual.

@madison420 why?

They laid out the uses for the apostrophe very clearly.

All you needed to do was read, understand, then clarify.

You’re using the apostrophe incorrectly and now you’ve acted like an angry pedantic individual.

Nearly anyone who’s bothered to read your garbage has disagreed with you.

Are you even a person -with your obstinance, you’re behaving like an LLM.

That is to say, you’re confidently incorrect while hallucinating the facts.