
The difference is that you are refusing to change your prior beliefs based on the new evidence being presented.
There’s no new evidence presented. “He’s an anarchist” has nothing to do with him being an idiot. He got people killed because of his own stupidity and recklessness, and he’s going to go to prison for that. Because self defense laws consider if your actions were reasonable given he situation as you perceived it, and the peacekeepers actions were perfectly reasonable, given the threats against the protest, and this idiots actions.
Also, the irony of a shitlib calling an anarchist a bootlicker. Go back to brunch, the wine has addled your brain.
“Liberal shitstain insists he’s not a liberal shitstain, more at 10.”
Did you write that up assuming I’m going to give a shit about what some diet fascist thinks about me? When your little Kyle Rittenhouse wannabe hero is charged, you’re going to think about me. I’m blocking you tho, I won’t ever think about you ever again.