I am probably too pedantic for that. If the recipe says 500g of this with 250g of that, it’s typically a good 2:1 mix and the packaging sizes often aligned. Now you have shit like 400g and 220g and you can’t easily align them anymore. Realistically it probably won’t matter even if it’s not a nearly perfect 2:1 mix either. But … I can’t help myself :D
- 0 Posts
- 21 Comments
I also like that they no longer align with typically required measurements for recipes. Nothing gets me off more than having to calculate fractions for amounts of ingredients.
aksdb@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Help with configuring Caddy to work with arr appsEnglish0·3 days agoDoes it make a difference, if that setting uses a trailing slash? Might be it redirects you to the path without, which triggers caddy to redirect you again, and so on and so forth.
You could also, instead of redirecting, rewrite it. Then it is handled serverside without sending the client somewhere else.
aksdb@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Help with configuring Caddy to work with arr appsEnglish0·3 days agoAre all the *arr services aware that they are expected to have a certain basepath?
LOL, ok, fair 😁
You should in any case consider your backup strategy. If you have reliable backups, your fuckups can’t be as bad anymore. If you don’t have reliable backups, a “raw” storage doesn’t help you either. Maybe even the contrary: you won’t notice, if individual files get corrupted or even lost until it’s too late. (Not talking about disk corruption, against which the right filesystem can guard you… but I am not sure you trust filesystems either 😛)
Why does the storage layer of seafile scare you? Are you also scared of databases and prefer storing things in raw txt files? The difference is the same. You get certain features in return:
- Versioning is possible (so each file can have a history you can roll back)
- Sync is very fast
- It can sync incremental changes even of big files
You still have access via:
- Web
- Synced locally using Seafile Client
- WebDAV
- Mounted as network filesystem anywhere using SeaDrive.
aksdb@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•A sovereign Microsoft 365 alternative: Nextcloud and IONOS join forces - NextcloudEnglish0·8 days agoI don’t like the syntax, the runtime environment (which runs interpreted) and for PHP more than many other languages (aside from JS), a lot of code out there is hacked together horribly which makes me completely distrust the community.
Personally I stay away from anything that doesn’t have a compiler.
aksdb@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•A sovereign Microsoft 365 alternative: Nextcloud and IONOS join forces - NextcloudEnglish0·8 days agoI was in the same boat and therefore my nextcloud instance was mostly running for backwards compatibility with a few setups I have, while I mostly use seafile, immich and sogo. But a few days ago I updated to nextcloud hub 10 (I think that’s with nextcloud 31 under the hood) and damn does that run smooth. I was so impressed I got motivated to finally setup the high performance backend for nc talk.
I still dislike PHP, but nextcloud just won back my heart a little.
On mobile I indeed also had that issue once. However I made sure they can’t lock me out completely. The db is stored using the opensource sqlcipher, so one can open it and extract everything manually, if absolutely necessary. As long as they don’t change this, I am fine. In the worst case that would still be a lot of effort for me, but not impossible.
The export has also improved a lot. You can now also export to JSON which includes all the data one could need.
If you don’t have a hard requirement of it being fully (!) OpenSource, then I would recommend Enpass. Relatively pleasing UI that runs native on Win, Mac, Linux, Android and iOS. It has browser plugins for Chrome and Firefox that talk directly to the running fat client (so no multiple authentication with different browsers necessary).
The password db is completely local, but it offeres several sync mechanisms like WebDAV or Dropbox or also iCloud; basically whatever can store files. If it’s a NAS in your home, it simply will sync once you are back home.
It also offers “WiFi Sync”, in which case you designate one machine running Enpass as the server and link other clients to it, then you don’t even need to run a separate hosting for it (but that machine needs to be on and running Enpass when you want to sync, obviously).
It’s basically a less open but much more convenient and beautiful KeePass(XC).
aksdb@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Looking for an html-based secure message serviceEnglish0·20 days agoI think CryptPad has delete-after-view.
Edit: yes, it has
aksdb@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•What is a self-hosted small LLM actually good for (<= 3B)English0·20 days agoTrue.
Although in Germany for example it can also be an issue when recording. If you have a security camera pointed at a public space (that can include the sidewalk infront of your house), passersby can sue you to take it down and potentially get you fined. Even pretending to constantly record such an area can yield that result.
aksdb@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•What is a self-hosted small LLM actually good for (<= 3B)English0·21 days agoSo, buzzer WRONG.
Quite arrogant after you just constructed a faulty comparison.
If I say my name is Doo doo head, in a public park, and someone happens to overhear it - they can do with that information whatever they want. Same thing.
That’s absolutely not the same thing. Overhearing something that is in the background is fundamentally different from actively recording everything going on in a public space. You film yourself or some performance in a park and someone happens to be in the background? No problem. You build a system to identify everyone in the park and collect recordings of their conversations? Absolutely a problem, depending on the jurisdiction. The intent of the recording(s) and the reasonable expectations of the people recorded are factored in in many jurisdictions, and being in public doesn’t automatically entail consent to being recorded.
See for example https://www.freedomforum.org/recording-in-public/
(And just to clarify: I am not arguing against your explanation of Twitch’s TOS, only against the bad comparison you brought.)
Pangolin is the most user friendly self hosted alternative to Cloudflare tunnels. There are dozens alternatives, but none with that feature set and such a UI.
aksdb@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Introducing Calendars, Contacts and Files in Stalwart | Stalwart LabsEnglish0·1 month agoYes. You can simply not expose SMTP at all and just use the IMAP/JMAP part. Unless you need also JMAP, I am not sure it brings you a lot to the table you wouldn’t also get from a good old dovecot. IMO the big advantage of Stalwart is the all-in-one package it delivers plus the good defaults. It also shines when you want a multi node deployment. For a single node IMAP only it might not be the best choice, in my opinion. But it would work, if you want to.
aksdb@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Introducing Calendars, Contacts and Files in Stalwart | Stalwart LabsEnglish0·1 month agoWe can ask, but the indicators are there:
- it has roadmap with bigger features that slowly shrinks as they get implemented
- new versions still bring big reworks (I think this is the third time now that the data structure is being migrated)
- optimizations happen between the versions
- benchmarks are still on the horizon
aksdb@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Introducing Calendars, Contacts and Files in Stalwart | Stalwart LabsEnglish0·1 month agoIt’s a 0.x release. It makes sense building the intended features first before optimizing heavily. There’s no point having an optimized data structure that then falls flat once you need to add new features that brings new requirements to the data structure.
Once they label it 1.x (i.e. feature complete and production ready) I would expect it to be optimized. If it isn’t, criticism is warranted.
Well exactly as you say: it’s a single service instead of having to combine multiple. In my case dovecot was a lot faster for my mailboxes, but postfix was a piece of shit and I was happy to get rid of it and the many components (rspamd, dkimproxy, etc.) it required. It has far too many footguns, and I shot myself multiple times with them over the years. So the most important part (SMTP) is significantly simpler and IMO better with stalwart. And the mailbox part hopefully evolves as well (it already has JMAP, so that is already an advantage over dovecot as well).
Use Stalwart as mailserver. Besides coming with sane defaults, it allows to put hooks into almost every mail stage. Those hooks can be sieve scripts, local binaries or http calls.
That’s the “pedantic” part that also gets me, but realistically it doesn’t really work out anyway, because the “servings” are individual sizes. I can’t really calculate exactly how much everyone is going to eat. So even if the recipe turns out the exact amount it intended, it could still be too much or not enough, simple because someone is more or less hungry than usual / expected.
I like having reproducible results, but practically with food it just doesn’t happen perfectly, even if I actually measure everything perfectly (amounts, time, etc.)