• 0 Posts
  • 28 Comments
Joined 10 days ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2025

help-circle
  • Isn’t that the same thing that made you give me the transphobic tag? Because you seem to be making your own definition of what’s transphobia

    What’s wrong with saying “people on X instance act like dumbasses” when they prove you right every time? It’s transphobic to point out my own experiences? Thus I guess saying that hexbear is full of genocide denying is discriminatory and same for saying republicans tend to be xenophobic fascists?

    When you get a good enough sample, associating something with a population is not wrong unless something proves it wrong. The likeliness of it being true is high. And even then, when the fuck did I say something about transgenders? When did I accuse them of anything? I’ve said that censorship around this issue is high and most defenders of the cause I’m opening a debate about are super entitled, censor things and flat out lie. If you believe only trangenders support this transgender athletes not being regulated and always being authorized then you’re transphobic according to your own words


  • conclusion that contradicts Science

    What science? You’ve not given any source to back your claims. Science does NOT say that transgender women athletes and cisgender women athletes are equal.

    you don’t care about inequality in sports or you’d be concerned about the inequality money provides

    How the fuck is this related? Rules can be decided easily, but making it so that each person has equal chance to get money is impossible and out of the question anyways. If you want to, then yea it changes the outcome, but we’re not fucking talking about all inequalities that exist else we wouldn’t stop talking. I’m focusing on a specific angle that has a high impact on the subject and that we can actually have an impact on.

    (who don’t have an outsized advantage)

    If you want to play this game then sure. Your conclusion contradicts science. If you don’t provide sufficient proof then you’re lying just like me I guess

    You’re trying to claim you’re Just Asking Questions, but it takes very little time interacting with you for your views to become abundantly clear. You are not nearly as clever or subtle as you think.

    You’re acting like a SJW and a science guy but you’re just pushing your own opinion without providing any proof and just spreading lies like “science says this” when it doesn’t.

    You’re not defending anything but idiocy

    I’m done talking with you. I’ve lost enough time to an hypocritical liar. There’s no crowd and this is going nowhere. We’re just both losing our time.



  • I’m not discrediting a group or marginalized people haha, I’m discrediting a stupid misinformation and censorship reason

    EXTREMELY LIMITED and STATISTICALLY IRRELEVANT experiences.

    Surely you’re all professional athletes here. And wtf are you talking about? I’m talking about the studies and researches I’ve done, not things I’ve experienced. You’re just lying.

    Then you proceed to do some mocking because your post was pretty much empty of any thing so might as well continue

    Get over it. Honestly, get over yourself. Grow up.

    I feel you’re the one getting triggered here. This makes it funnier when you see this totally applies to you



  • I really do not care what some rando on the Internet came up with by “doing their own research” unless they have receipts

    I hope you’re aware this applies to you as well

    I don’t want to take the time to prove you my research and shit. Maybe someone will take the time to do it, and props to them.

    That’s how we got anti-vaxxers and flat earthers.

    Blindly repeating the opinion of the majority on a same platform is also a great way to spread misinformation. I’m simply giving my opinion in hopes of creating doubt in people’s mind so that they fact check it and get the truth. Most people stating things aren’t giving out the sources like that, and asking for it each time the facts are different is a great way to prevent those people from speaking at all.

    Barely anyone check, so if a thread is full of people saying the same thing, one will assume it’s the truth but it might not be

    So we know this is a problem but fixing it isn’t important. Trans people in sports we don’t know is a problem, trying to “fix” it is creating other problems, so why is that more important to focus on?

    You’re going off topic here





  • I financially frauded once. I’ve never been penalized for it. That must mean the government is fine with it.

    I insulted someone in a game and never got penalized for it, so it must mean the moderators in that game are okay with it.

    It’s the same kind of logic, no?

    That’s the kind of things that happens. Else I guess I hallucinated a couple times in a row, or I mod removed my posts and banned my account by myself. Must be what happened.

    Either everything is moderated and censored, or nothing. No in between can exist.

    Seriously, come on, that’s not how it works and you know it as much as me.

    And fortunately there are still mods that let you speak, people that don’t report you… but what I describe will end up happening if you have these kind of behaviors or point of view.


  • Studies did not find that there’s a lack of advantage as well, therefore why use it as a point? What I meant is that there’s place for a debate on this question.

    There has been no advantage shown in the short or long sprint events nor any other categories.

    I’ll have to disagree with you on this. Based on my research I did not find conclusive evidence on this. A sample size inferior to thousands is not sufficient to test anyways.

    Athletes with more money poured into them for training and equipment have a significant advantage over other athletes.

    That’s a well known problem. Sadly, not much we can do to fix it without creating other problems. We’re all unequal on this :(


  • If you want an example, I said trans athletes being in man or women categories is a debate and shouldn’t be allowed by default because of inequalities between the individuals, and true equality can never be reached.

    I believe the use of “biological men” trigged them when I said that transgender women were that… when I was talking about scientific stuff to make my point.

    Super transphobic, watch out! ☢️ -_-







  • Depends on the things you say, where…

    If you’re generally leftist, you should mostly be fine.

    Otherwise you get banned for trolling (because ofc they’re right so you’re trolling) or transphobia, because if you don’t agree with everything a trans person says, you’re transphobic. Also, the world belongs to them.

    Talk about lesser known subjects by the public or make a mistake yourself? Thats it, you’re banned for misinformation and trolling. Or being a nazi or racist or whatever. The words don’t have a meaning anymore

    Also the random ban reasons like “Rule 3” which refers to the most open and subjective rules like “Be civil” or “Dont be a dick” or similar