- 7 Posts
- 22 Comments
11·3 days agoRemoved by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Sure, but the playbooks show where files are being put, which is what you requested.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Well what’s the delta between the two? Just searching adding the “-R” seems to be a lesser version with things like missing ports. Logic says if you’re using NUT that it would at least have network or serial to communicate with something, and it would work just fine, but look for reviews and figure out what the difference is since it’s not listed as a defined product model on the Cyberpower pages.
The real question is: why do you need this much memory?
If it’s not actually going to be used, you’re spending more money acquiring it now than you would later.
Why? It’s free if you don’t setup a custom runner and those cover your areas.
Because the MAC address isn’t a part of the tcp/ip exchange. You’re specifically addressing TCP/IP only.
If you’re trying to block something by MAC address, you’re doing it wrong.
Why the name change though? Most projects put up a deprecation notice on the old one and a link to the new if they do this.
Separate your services if possible. NAS just needs to store files. Eggs in one basket, fault tolerance yada yada.
It’s called a hosts file
This is a stupid solution though.
You really want a local DNS forwarder. There’s a ton. Dnsmasq being one of the most widely deployed. Your router probably runs it and has the ability to set static DNS entries from DHCP as well.
Drive controller board or the interface. The physical plates inside are likely fine though. You can probably have this recovered for under $500.
This is great news. There are three judges currently embroiled in this, and I hope they throw the fucking book at the defense lawyers and anyone else who told them to lie about this. Prolonged contempt at a minimum, but let the lawsuits fly against these pieces of shit and Musk for sure.