

Also would help in general to cite English language sources in a discussion that happens in English.
Also would help in general to cite English language sources in a discussion that happens in English.
There is a 100% effective solution to ending wars on planet Earth, most people are just opposed to the end of the human species for some reason.
“lawmakers” seem like an inappropriate term for the kind of enemies of the general population who usually demand these kinds of measures.
Don’t forget that they are literally being lead by a political movement named after the history denying idea that they were “great” at some point and want to get back to that (never mind the other lie that the leaders of the movement don’t actually want to get back to any particular point in history despite the name)
And, here is the important part, those rich people need that money so their high score wealth is bigger than that other rich person’s high score like wealth, not for mundane reasons like improving their quality of life or anything.
“Never forget” is great and all but from a German perspective it seems to not be enough. It is much more important to make sure the same or very similar things do not happen again, not by China and not by any other nation. Otherwise you end up like we did here in Germany where decades of “never forget” lead to very similar sentiments being expressed by a new major party but since things are slightly different (e.g. the “never forget” was always phrased to be about Jews, this is more about foreigners in general) people seem to allow themselves to ignore them.
This means that Israel presently relies on an external backer for its security (the US).
Makes you wonder if Israel is trying to grab as much land as possible and eliminate as many people who might have competing claims on that land as possible before the US collapses economically (and with that their giant military budget) now that Donald Trump is doing his best to make that a reality.
Presumably in terms of numbers most of those are single use so think of them more as ammo than as aircraft.
The big difference is that an atomic bomb would still be useful once it is revealed while this would likely be significantly less effective.
Intel is very different from secrets. Secrets can be blown wide open if they are leaked by one person.
You are confusing nations with people. You can’t trust a nation (or any other organization), you can only trust individuals because an organization can always contain individuals of diametrically opposed behaviors.
Personally I would instead consider how the recent advances in drone technologies could be applied to underwater operations and/or water-based launch platforms.
Nuclear submarines feel like a relic of the cold war at this point.
Why would anyone even consider telling any politicians of foreign nations about a top secret project like that, much less blabbermouths like Donald Trump?
Only privileged people can afford to pretend that “apolitical” is something that exists.
Sometimes I wonder why there isn’t a term ‘sports terrorist’ but they easily declared much more harmless activities by climate activists as ‘eco terrorism’.
Wooden roof beams are also 100% plant fibers, as are wool sweaters and the sewer system definitely can not handle neither of those.
How about we include Ukraine but throw out the US?
Most definitions I find define Gen Z as early 2010s or 2012 as the end year which would make plenty of them underage still.
More like “All chimps listens to the most charismatic chimps even though they are narcissistic idiots and that leads to their destruction”