• It’s always useful to display the fair weather friend relationship that we have with companies. The rainbows are a terribly useful example. Corporations cannot be your friend, and any insinuation otherwise just pisses me off.

  • Allemaniac@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    kinda ironic to have the genres “voices” and “culture”, when clearly those are not welcome in the US no more

  • Nikls94@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    They want some gay money.

    Disgusting,

    I’d rather have lawyers advertising unequal rights this month than companies making their logo a rainbow. Something like: straight couples have automatic inheritance and survivor rights while same-sex partners often get nothing.

    • Allemaniac@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      who hurt your little homophobic brain? Could it be that you never confronted yourself about your sexuality and now project every inclusive idea as being narrative-pushing? Couldn’t it just be, that academic people understand that different cultures are nothing to be scared off, and that they just want to be inclusive and equal for ALL people on this planet? Just leave it be, you make yourself look like a sore loser honestly

      • Nikls94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh I’ve been confronted about my sexuality a lot and looking back at my dating history being gay would be way better. I had the opportunities, I tried it, but I’m just not gay.

        I don’t get that the inclusivity is limited by the month of June. The rest of the year most of these companies don’t do anything to address inequality.