• aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Isn’t this the same psycho whose reaction to Minnesota politicians being assassinated was conspiracy theories?

  • CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Great!! Fuck right off USA!!! Without you idiotic dipshits in NATO the rest of the aligned countries don’t have to listen to your moronic whining to spend $ on US defense weaponry/planes etc. You won’t be missed and piss off. From Canada’s POV we’re really looking forward to spending billions on Saab Gripens - so we can protect ourselves from you.

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    They want out because it’s stopping to be a market for the US military industries, as Europe increasingly wants to spend domestically. As such, it now has very little interest.

    US: We want you to spend more on defence!
    Europe: Ok, we will buy more, from our own companies!
    US: That’s not what I meant! I’m going home!

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      Cause and effect are a little twisted here. Trump was already undermining NATO during is first term by saying European members should spend more. They didn’t agree at the time, but the Ukraine War proved that Europe really did need a more domestic MIC, and now they are.

      Trump wasn’t saying it in the first place because he thought it would help NATO.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They wanted to leave during Trump’s first term because it helps Russia’s war with Europe

      The increased spending is just meant to make the incumbents unpopular so the Russian backed candidates can win

  • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I hope so. The united snakes should not have any influence for all the countries they bombed and couped for decades

  • reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I keep getting this sinking feeling that this is all leading up to a precise and coordinated attack of evil.

    Russia bombards the EU, the US attacks Greenland and Canada, while Israel finally bulldozes Gaza and Iran. China takes Taiwan and the south sea.

    All at the same time so NATO is overwhelmed and can’t decisively defend it all without risking spreading too thin. No matter what happens, one of the bad guys gains ground.

    I honestly have no idea if this is even possible, it’s based on a dream I had a few weeks ago.

    Disturbing thought though.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Russia is losing against Ukraine, the fuck they gonna do against EU, unless they use nukes in which case who cares, it’s game over

      • Dogiedog64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Graveyard of empires for a reason. They can try to OORAH!! MISSLES AWAY!!! Iran all they want, the resulting occupation will NEVER be a peaceful one, as there will ALWAYS be rebels in the hills and deserts.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Israel, Iran, China, and Taiwan are all outside the scope of NATO.

      Canada, Greenland, and most of the EU do fall under NATO protection though. It’s a defensive alliance with well defined boundaries, member countries may have interests in other parts of the world, but since none of Israel, Iran, China, or Taiwan are NATO members it’s not something NATO deals with. Unless one of those countries were to attack NATO of course.

      Russia is in no shape to make war on Europe right now, they have their hands full with just Ukraine, and face economic collapse. Iran is in a similar situation. Trump has stopped his 51st state talk, but he’s insane so you never know. China invading Taiwan? Trump is weak (he only talks tough) so you never know. But China is authoritarian and as we’ve seen of late authoritarian regimes don’t seem to be doing well running military campaigns so it’s possible they don’t even have the capability of invading Taiwan.

    • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I can see trump believing something so stupid as that, and putin might saber rattle about it, but the majority of the world, and china/india especially in this situation, probably would not go along with it. Europe still has functioning nuclear capabilities. Putin does not want nukes hitting his country, full stop. China does not want a nuclear situation kicking off with their neighbor to the north, and knows that the US under trump would likely turn on them despite a war ruining both countries. India no more wants china controlling the waters to their east than the countries immediately around those waters do, and would likely cause issues, which china also doesn’t want. As we’ve seen in the modern times with ukraine and some of the middle east conflicts and the india/pakistan border, nuclear powers tiptoe around anything that resembles direct conflict. The recent dogfight over the border was a pretty good idea of how reserved even ‘open’ conflict is.

      So putin is likely not going to do anything more than a symbolic grunt at his western border, and china will just slowly weather down taiwan if the u.s. is withdrawing its influence. The idea of reunification isn’t THAT taboo in taiwan, and the candidates for it gather a decent chunk of votes. If the u.s. starts acting like a bitch around the world (oh, gee, just look at what’s happening right now), the sentiment towards it and china could easily see a rapid shift.

      • reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I agree with you, but my tinfoil hat is telling me to dig a shelter, preserve food and start making ammo. You know, for game hunting.

  • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    For the other nations in nato it would be for the best (imo obviously). Republican usa is not a reliable ally and the other nato nations have not all come to terms with that new reality yet. If the usa quits nato, then it instantly removes all doubt and the remaining nations of NATO can immediately start work on improving the alliance, instead of being stuck in limbo for a few more years while they’re hoping that the usa will somehow magically unfuck itself.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      We already know all of that and work is already being done to improve the alliance among non-US NATO members. The US is already considered non-reliable and the only benefit of the US being a member is that it puts some doubt in the minds of adversaries long enough to build up the militaries of the non-US members.

  • Tillyrblue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I’m in no way supporting Russia or Republicans when I say this but NATO since its inception has been used for Western imperialist goals and establishing US global hegemony, so in no way do I support its existence anymore

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You are in every way supporting both Russia and the Republicans saying that. If It wasn’t for nato, the Baltic states and maybe even some central European countries wouldn’t exist by now.

      • Tillyrblue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Sorry I’m not supporting an imperialist military organization that bombs civilians and has had nazi leadership

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You don’t have to support nato if you don’t want to… just don’t say you are not supporting Russia. Nato has one purpose and it’s to stop the Soviet union / Russia from taking over Europe.

  • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If they’re going to withdraw then why are they strong arming all the other nations to spending 5% GDP on defense? If they’re not in NATO, who gives a fuck what they want?

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        So, they wished the increased spending to the monkey paw and got exactly what they were wishing for: countries are cancelling orders of complex US equipment all over the world, and Europe is developing a military industry to compete with them.

      • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        But that’s definitely (hopefully?) not going to happen if they pull out of NATO.

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Never underestimate the corruption and stupidity of European politicians. “Divide and conquer” works like a charm on most of our corrupt assholes. See the stupid opportunist fuck that the Germans elected chancellor. His (our :'( ) government is pushing for the use of the Palantir(!) software from fucking uber-Nazi-piece-of-shit Thiel in German administrations.

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If the US leaves NATO, Europe would lose a lot of support.

    If the US stays in NATO, they would refuse to support them anyway and could use their veto power to stop any potential action.

    If they’re not going to have the support of the US military either way, and the US staying in NATO could prevent the organization from taking any action at all, it may be in the best interest of Europe for the US to leave NATO so they can’t cripple it from within.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      NATO is a defensive alliance so the only thing a US veto would do is prevent Ukraine from joining NATO. But that wouldn’t happen until the war is over, and it doesn’t look like that’s going to happen until Russia’s economy collapses. At that point Russia won’t be a threat for awhile so kick the US out, add Ukraine as a member since Ukraine would be a stronger ally than the US anyway.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This bill is going nowhere, and Trump just said at the summit that he would honor article 5.
    I know Trump often changes his mind, but the summit showed that Trump has definitely changed course for the better regarding NATO.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    What’s next? Helping Russia in their wars? I hope it was fucking worth it to “own the libs.”