China has dramatically curtailed its lending in recent years. Now, it’s emerging as the largest debt collector for many of the world’s poorest nations — a shift that threatens to undermine poverty reduction efforts and fuel instability, according to a new report.

Lending for China’s Belt and Road Initiative — which includes funding for a massive series of new railways, ports and roads in the developing world — began winding down before the COVID-19 pandemic, according to Peak repayment: China’s global lending, released this month by Australia’s Lowy Institute, a foreign policy think tank. The report points to diplomatic pressure within China to restructure unsustainable debt and to recover outstanding debts from abroad for the change.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Every time China visits we get a hospital, every time Britain visits we get a lecture.

    ~ Dr Lubinda Haabazoka, Director of the University of Zambia Graduate School of Business and former President of the Economics Association of Zambia

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Except they don’t get the hospital, they get loaned money to build a hospital, and China expects them to default. Then China takes the hospital.

      It’s even more obvious when it’s a shipping port. You’ve built a port for China to control.

      • fantoozie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Right but Western aid has only ever done good right? I mean, that’s why South America and Central Africa are booming with industry and lack any serious endemic diseases right? Because the West made sure they would have the same living standards and be seen as truly equal competitors , right?..right?

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    A 2023 Associated Press analysis of the dozen countries most indebted to China — including Pakistan, Kenya, Zambia, Laos and Mongolia — found debt servicing payments were consuming vitally needed tax revenue for schools, electricity, food and fuel.

    I guess this would be a litmus test for the CCP’s foreign policy for the future. Whether they choose to strengthen stability by canceling or restructuring debt, or foster PRC-branded instability. They’ve been materially playing the stability and reliability partner card recently with some. We’ll see if this factors into these debt decisions.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yea, it’s almost like they should be compared with the developed world instead of the developing world.

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    When it’s the Western Empire doing it through the IMF or Wall Street that’s good. When it’s China, it’s bad.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      “During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.”

      -Michael Parenti Blackshirts and the reds

      • rhythmisaprancer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Fascists have argued that the enemy is both strong and weak, for a long time. The enemy changes over time perhaps, but it doesn’t seem that the far right does.