See the use of “but” there implies a fallacy of some kind. Schumer kowtows to the party when they are unified. Which is rare. But he is and always has been an explicit tool of zionists. Your “facts” arent going to bother anyone. Are you a teenager or something?
Schumer is explicitly a hardcore zionist…
I’m not disagreeing with you on that. But the fact that a hardcore zionist has already voted to convict Trump in the past still stands.
See the use of “but” there implies a fallacy of some kind. Schumer kowtows to the party when they are unified. Which is rare. But he is and always has been an explicit tool of zionists. Your “facts” arent going to bother anyone. Are you a teenager or something?
LMAO, takes one to know one. Great argument, go join the MAGAs if you can’t contribute to the conversation with us adults.
You said, “Whoops, I probably hurt someones antizionist feelings because of the facts.” after not pointing out anything surprising or upsetting.
That is not how rational mature people talk to eachother… or think… but okay.