In remarks at a judicial conference, Roberts bemoaned what he characterized as the American public’s misconceptions about the Supreme Court.

Chief Justice John Roberts on Wednesday defended the Supreme Court from what he believes are misconceptions held by the American people that he and his colleagues are “political actors” who are making decisions based on policy, not law.

Roberts is a member of the court’s 6-3 conservative majority, which has moved federal law to the right on a number of weighty issues in recent years, such as abortion and gun rights.

The court has also in several cases weakened the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965, including in a ruling last week that led to outrage and disappointment on the left.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 minutes ago

    Spare us your denial asshole. We are knee deep in the bullshit you have created already.

  • themaninblack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    What does he think he’s doing by constantly complaining about this?

    Justices definitely consider their words before speaking. What could possibly be the reason beyond letting off steam… repetitively and publicly?

    Is it to tamp down public criticism of the court? If so, who cares? It won’t work, and they have lifetime appointments.

    Is it out of guilt because the assertion is obviously factually untrue?

    Maybe some of these guys just watch way too much Fox News and conservative media. They’ve been airing grievances just like these outlets. LOOKING AT YOU ALITO

  • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Just a reminder that between his Ivy League connections, his Reagan/Bush services, and Chief Justice Rehnquist’s untimely demise, Mr. Non-Political-Actor here went from mere well-placed attorney to Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States in less than five years, mostly by way of his work on Bush v. Gore in 2000.

    Not a political actor, lol.

  • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I often wonder if they believe this themselves, or if they just cynically say crap like this out of contempt for people.

    • 4grams@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      It’s contempt, they all belive they are better than us, that by saying nothing it makes it true. They know they are lying but they are in positions of power that no longer require their honesty. Lying is more lucrative.

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      They think the republic is already dead. They are playing the sheep for their masters, to live out their lives in imperial splendor as they betray their country and oaths.

  • 2piradians@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Is it true?

    Could I really have lost touch with the tenets of this office?

    No. it’s the citizens who are wrong.

  • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Awww, did some nasty journalist say that you volunteer to wear a leash for Trump daily? Diddums. You used to think you were cleverly manipulating the constitution behind the scenes for your own political ends and were being subtle about it, but now everyone says you’re his bitch and you know full well he’s a moron who shouldn’t be in charge of you, so you lost any self respect you ever had because you realised Trump has no less contempt for you than he has for any temporarily useful stupid idiot who swallowed his lies and was used by him to cement power and stroke his own ego.

  • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    We know Roberts isnt playing politics. He thinks he’s a priest-king who can dictate his own beliefs as inarguable decree.

    It would be one thing if he followed the history of the court and was bound by precedent, but letting six functionaries who were specifically asked about abortion and made unambiguous promises to respect it overturn the recognized right of bodily autonomy has made every right Americans enjoy subject to judicial nullification

    The only sane thing is to specifically take away judicial supremacy, and restore the unelected academics to a subordinate role deferential to the actually elected branches of our government. Sure, wed essentially give up any hope of free speech or marriage rights or religious liberty being out of the each of Congress, but better a Congress who can be voted out than judges who arent protecting those rights anyway.

  • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Lady Justice and the Constitution were your personal plaything, Roberts, but you prostituted them for Trump and now that you’ve made them completely subservient to his crazy stupid nastiness, you’ve realised he doesn’t need your permission for anything anymore and just expects your compliance. You’re his toy now and you want the American people, who you fucked over for decades, to supply the respect for the constitution and the law that you squandered so fully?