Canadians are playing defensive. They really need to go on the offensive.

  • Get all Government departments and Crown Corporations to cancel Microsoft Office. Use LibreOffice.

  • Get all Government departments and Crown Corporations to cancel Microsoft Windows. Use Linux.

  • Ban all foreign linked consulting firms (McKinsey, Bain) from obtaining any government contract.

  • Announce a $100 million Canadian fund to support opensource software like Krita, Gimp, Kdenlive, Inkscape. Time to take down Adobe.

  • Cancel the F-35. Buy old F-16s instead. It’s better to have 5 planes that fly than one expensive plane that doesn’t work.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Hundreds of thousands of dead children and counting in exchange for recognizing statehood, maybe, in a month’s time and only if Hamas surrenders.

      That’s not the moral highground you seem to think it is.

      • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        So you’d prefer nothing at all happening? Cuz that’s what that this “all or nothing” mentality accomplishes

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          That’s a perfect example of a False Dichotomy - there are literally thousands of options other that merely “nothing” and “non-binding promise full of caveats of no-impact future action”.

          Quite a lot of those thousands of options actually impact Israel NOW.

          Chosing to avoid any of those impactful action options and pushing instead for a “promise of future no impact action, if certain vague conditions are met” is exactly how politicians avoid being accused of “doing nothing” whilst de facto doing nothing: this a very common political strategy to avoid action until it’s too late when under pressure from public opinion to act now, so it’s actually worse than doing nothing at all (because it has the same practical results as doing nothing at all, whilst reducing pressure to act hence making it less likely that effective actions will ever be taken).

          You seem to have fallen for this common political scam hook, line and sinker.

          • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 hours ago

            At what point has anyone said “oh yep that’s all I need from you Canada that’s good enough”

            nobody is claiming this is a good stopping point. Nobody is using this to halt their push for more. They’re just saying that it’s a good thing to have happened.

            • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Had this been done when there was no Holocaust by Starvation in Gaza and those politicians were not under public pressure to do something about it, then yeah, it would have been a positive action for Palestine as whole since it would open the door for eventual improvements there, but right now, by delaying effective action as wished by the public, that tiny positive potential impact in the future is more than offset by the continued deaths that mean there will be no such Future for tens of thousands or even millions in Gaza, and this “action” does nothing to address that.

              The greatest impact this has is to reduce pressure on those politicians to address the problem, so de facto this is a step backwards compared to “doing nothing” as it wields the same result to Gazans whilst by reducing the pressure on politicians makes it less likely that they’re forces to take an effective action.

              The only way to confuse this with a step forward if you completelly ignore the broader context of how most of the people who might derive a tiny benefit from this will be dead or have lost far more than they will gain from said tiny benefit when that benefit delivers anything, and the political managing of public opinion component of this.

                • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  You’re the one dying on the hill of defending that grand proclamations of how they’re going to help Palestine from the very politicians currently shipping weapons to Israel should be taken unquestionably at face value, and hence that they’re really taking a step forward.

    • mrdown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      It took an ongoing genocide for a conditional state recognition. So they will probly do the next step when there is no longer any palestinian in palestine

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        They’ll pivot to “It’s too late now”, which is always how political delaying tactics like this one work.

        Carney learned his politics working for the Tories (who are basically posh Fascists) in Britain as head of the Bank Of England and this tactic of promising something near meaningless in the future to avoid doing now the actual things required to address the problem that the public opinion demands (such as sanctions on Israel) is very common over there.

        This shit is pure hypocrisy, which is why the British Government (who, right now, are arresting people for merelly planning to demonstrate against the Genocide) came up with the idea.