• the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    So you think that folks registered as independent get no say in the nominees? Everyone should have a say in who represents them regardless of any party affiliation. So in this situation you are either the boot on their neck or a bootlicker.

    • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Everyone should get a say in who represents them and that is what the general election is for. Why should non-members decide who represents the party they haven’t joined? That’s just entitlement.

      Again you shouldn’t use words you do not understand or know the meaning of.

      • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Thanks for confirming. Btw what tastes better? Black leather or brown? Also do you get excited at the opportunity to lick a new boot? Or does leather from a certain animal taste any better or worse than others? For example you look at some less common types of leather and think “oh boy ostrich! My favorite!”

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      In a closed primary system, Independents have two options:

      1. Change their party registration so they can vote in the primary that most appeals to them.

      2. Wait for the general and then vote.

      The whole point of a closed primary is to keep out non-party members.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Nobody is disenfranchised, Independents can have their own primary, and nobody is being prevented from voting in the general.

          If Independents really want to have a say in who the Republican or Democratic candidate is, all they have to do is re-register. It’s free and easy.