Some years ago, I hosted my own matrix server for a few months. I’m an experienced self-hoster, but I remeber that Matrix was paticularly hard to host, requiring weird proxy rules, DNS adjustments, federation never worked reliably and push notifications never worked at all. I ditched the project soon because I also had no real use for it. However, I recently had some ideas where a Matrix server would be useful again. Has anyone attempted to install it recently and can tell me whether the situation has improved? Also, which server do you recommend? There still is synapse but I found it paticularly complicated to host. Dendrite is now archived and the current fork seems to be tuwunel which doesn’t seem to be under very active development.

  • illusionist@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Matrix works good. Two years ago Element should’ve been what element Next is today. But it is getting there. It still has great backers and lots of users. As long as there is no direct alternative, it’ll get there.

    I don’t want american companies owning all my data and neither do companies want that.

    It’s not the shiny new kid anymore but there is no other new shiny kid. Hence, it is still the brightest and newest kid.

  • underline960@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Damn. That sucks. (Edit: Referring to the comments saying Matrix is dead and dying.)

    I get that IRC and XMPP are more stable and built around federation from the ground up, but… they’re not Discord replacements.

    That was IMHO, the point of Matrix/Element.

    Tell me if I’m wrong, but a significant part of a network’s resilience is the number of nodes and users.

    Without a glowup or some kind of repackaging, IRC/XMPP are doomed to stay niche.

    • Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well Discord started as a replacement for IRC and TeamSpeak/Mumble, then began to add more and more things and got used as a forum replacement and everything went down the hill. Why not going back to the roots? We had fucking IRC scripts for matchmaking in Q3CTF.

      • underline960@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I wouldn’t mind going back to IRC roots if it could be made more user friendly and integrate voice and video chat.

        Good UX/UI goes a long way to make it so non-technical people can join and strengthen the network.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Discord has quite a few good features that IRC doesn’t. I will agree that it being used as a replacement for a forum, while also being unsearchable, is amazingly stupid. However, it’s used by almost everyone for a reason, and to ignore that (if you were to develop and alternative) ensures you won’t succeed. Yeah, we don’t need every feature from Discord, but easy voice/text/video chats, image/file sharing, and all the other useful things are required. Yeah, we can probably lose the emotes and crap and be fine.

    • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Xmpp supports group chat, 1:1 messaging, you’ve got webtrc support for voice/video, and its extensible.

      Jingle even has screen sharing (and I think a WIP remote control function).

      What is missing from xmpp?

      • underline960@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Technically, nothing.

        In practice, who do you know that’s using it and doesn’t run Arch, by the way?


        My point isn’t that IRC/XMPP aren’t technically capable.

        It’s that they’re not designed for non-technical users.

        I want corporate social media to die. Mastodon and Piefed are far from killing the beast, but they’ve made the more progress than most projects have seen in a long time.

        I want corporate messaging to die. Matrix is far from killing the beast, but for a little while, at least it was trying.

        • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          In practice, who do you know that’s using it and doesn’t run Arch, by the way?

          Well I mostly run Debian, but I do have arch on a machine so maybe I don’t count.

          It’s that they’re not designed for non-technical users.

          Have to agree there, it takes some effort if you’re setting it up for friends and family.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Quicksy and Prav apps allow you to easily signup via SMS verification like WhatApp etc. Super easy and the app works like Whatsapp, completely usable for non technical users (much more so than any Matrix client).

          And Snikket is an super easy all in one solution for running a XMPP based small group server with invite based onboarding. Also completely non-technical user compatible.

    • pedz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I had the same experience as OP when I tried Matrix a few years ago. No hate on it but it was not easy and I gave up because I already had a simple IRC setup that’s working for me and my friends.

      Some IRC clients are now web based and it’s been enough to keep a few of my friends there instead of Discord. We use The Lounge. It can keep a history, display images, videos, play mp3s, and show previews of most URLs. Like, we can simply copy/paste images into a channel and they are uploaded on the server and displayed in the chat. There’s also push notifications and it’s mobile friendly.

      Convos also does something like this. Apparently it can also do video chat but I’ve never got it to work.

      I’ve recently been thinking about giving Matrix another try but I’m pretty sure my friends are going to stay on “modern” IRC anyway.

  • tvcvt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I have synapse server running in docker on a VPS and it’s been pretty reliable. At my office I use it as sort of a self-hosted Slack replacement. For our use case, I don’t have federation enabled, so no experience on that front. It’s a small office and everyone here uses either Element or FuzzyChat on desktop and mobile. It runs behind an nginx reverse proxy and I’ve got SSO set up with Authentik and that’s worked very well. Happy to share some configs if that would be useful.

  • Señor Mono@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I installed synapse some weeks ago. Pretty easy, straightforward. Even managed to install some bridges.

    After the last matrix.org incident and some info about the failing message retention, I just killed the server again. I’m not comfy with the service being so greedy/resource hungry and also the usability sucks at certain points.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    If you want a conduwuit sucessor, I’d choose the continuwuity project over tuwunel. The legitimacy as the sucessor is mainly self-proclaimed, and continuwuity is a community effort. The entire thing is kind of a shitshow, though. If you want to do it like 99% of people, make friends with Synapse.

    I think what you describe still holds true. You need a few correct DNS entries and an open port. Once you want VoIP, some more ports and a TURN server will become necessary. I didn’t find it too hard. And I run continuwuity these days because Synapse wastes too much resources for what I do and their other efforts went nowhere. But I’m not sure about the future of those smaller Matrix server projects.

    And if you don’t like Matrix or can’t get it to run, maybe try something like XMPP.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        We’ve had the discussion a while back here in selfhosted. You can find it here: https://awful.systems/post/5029223

        Main points: Continued drama around people, and tuwunel is tied to a single, (paid) developer and I figure once there’s anything wrong with that, tuwunel might die instantly. While continuwuity is a community effort and maybe that’s a bit more sustainable. Though I don’t own any crystal ball and I don’t know how things will turn out.

    • Helix 🧬@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you want a conduwuit sucessor, I’d choose the continuwuity project over tuwunel.

      You realise that sounds insane, right?

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sure, I believe that is supposed to be uWu or maybe some kind of puppy talk. It’s certainly originally started by June, who turned conduit (which is a sane name) into conduwuit.

        I figured I’ve lost all shame anyway, back when we discussed nerd topics in the school bus or the 5 'o clock train, like Linux lore, anime, Star Trek concepts and technobabble. I mean people were staring and I’m aware of that, but I’ve really lost all F*'s to give. And that turns me into the person who I am today, and I’ll happily write sentences like the one above. Or still talk about Star Trek in a crowded train. And these days it’s the mycelial network and that really makes people question my sanity. 🫠

    • qtip@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I switched from IRC to matrix in 2018 specifically because I found mobile difficult.

      I used the suggestion in your linked document by running irssi in a tmux session on a VPS I paid for, then using a bridge to an app on my phone. I found the experience to be cumbersome even for someone like myself (and even then irssi required reboots or else it would lose performance over time).

      I wanted to use IRC for a family chat, but I couldn’t possibly convince my friends and family to go through the same client setup as I did.

      In my opinion there are use cases that either IRC or Matrix would be preferred over the other (not to mention other self hosted communication software).

  • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    IRC and XMPP are infinitely less painful, honestly, and both were designed around federation from the ground up, long before it was cool.

    • deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      IRC does not have any federation, and XMPP does it in a completely different way from Matrix that has unique pros and cons.

      IRC is designed for you to connect to a specific server, with an account on that server, to talk to other people on that server. There is no federation, you cannot talk to oftc from libera.chat. Alongside that, with mobile devices being so common, you’d need to get people to host their own bouncer, or host one for nearly everyone on your network.

      XMPP federation conceptually has one major difference compared to Matrix: XMPP rooms are owned by the server that created them, whereas Matrix rooms are equally “owned” by everyone participating in it, with the only deciding factor being which users have administrator permissions.

      This makes for better (and easier) scaling on XMPP, so rooms with 50k people isn’t that big of an issue for any users in that room. However, if the server owning the room goes down, the whole room is down, and nobody can chat. See Google Talk dropping XMPP federation after making a mess of most client and server implementations.

      On Matrix, scaling is a much bigger issue, as everyone connects with everyone else. Your single-person homeserver has to talk with every other homeserver you interact with. If you join a lot of big rooms, this adds up, and takes a lot of resources. However, when a homeserver goes down, only the people on that homeserver are affected, not the rooms. Just recently, matrix.org had some trouble with their database going down. Although it was a bit quieter than usual, I only properly noticed when it was explicitly mentioned in chat by someone else. My service was not interrupted, as I host my own homeserver.

      The Matrix method of federation definitely comes with some issues, some conceptually, and some from the implementation. However, a single entity cannot take down the federated Matrix network, even when taking down the most used homeservers. XMPP is effectively killed off by doing the same.

      • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You’re absolutely incorrect about IRC. Would you like to learn? Open IRC federation is basically never used anymore and the few networks that exist are very stable (if not completely calcified), but it is a core feature of the design, and in the old days, massive interconnected networks of IRC servers like EFnet and Undernet spanned the globe, there were even some servers that allowed open federation (EFnet is actually named for it – eris-free-net referring to the last server “eris” that supported free federation), and at some points Netsplits were a frustratingly daily occurrence. Like with any federation, abuse is the reason we can’t really have nice things anymore, but IRC absolutely supports federation. Not very well from a modern standpoint since it didn’t really keep up with the abuse arms race, but when it was first conceived it was way ahead of its time.

  • Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Tbh I had no issues with synapse.

    The problems that persist: Very rare issues with decrypting (as I rarely encounter it, while being in encrypted chats with 150+ users, it’s not an issue for me), apart from after you changed clients, slow image loading (a bit annoying, but ok if you multitask anyway) and clients all having different feature sets (some of which you can also hackily make work in others).

  • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I host my tuwunnel server and I am happy with it. The lack of a top level client is my turn down. Element X is good but still lacking, and fluffy chat is maybe better looking but more lacking.

    My matrix use case is only WhatsApp and telegram backup using the bridges, actually… So YMMV.

  • verstra@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    My matrix server is nearing 5 years old. I have federation disabled, because I don’t need that - we are using it as a family chat. sqlite database I’m using is now 2GB, but other than that it is working great.

    I do acknowledge that I’m not leveraging the things matrix is designed for (federation, e2e encryption), but to be honest, it’s not really good at that.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Way back in 2023, Matrix was the jack of all trades but the master of none. It wanted to replace Discord but the video messaging was not stable enough. It wanted to replace Slack but message searching didn’t really work. It was still struggling to get a decent client and server implementation, and message loading times were a huge pain point.

    Fast forward to today, most of the problems are still there. Give it a couple more years to cook.

  • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I set it up during the outage last week.

    Easy enough to just pull in the synapse docker container and run it on my home server. I wireguard it to my VPS that acts as a reverse proxy.

    Both federation and push notifications work.

  • cactus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    damn, was not expecting to see so much hate towards matrix.
    it sure was annoying to set up, but once I got it up the way I wanted, it kind of just worked from that moment on. I’ve had it for some 5 months now and it works as intended with no issues, aside from some small glitches here and there which get fixed very fast (on the mobile app).
    my use case was getting off Discord with a bunch of friends, so we needed a reliable way to have multiple chats, channels/rooms and good voice chat with screen sharing. element call does those well. my federation is of course also closed. for me e2ee is just a bonus
    I think that if that’s your use case, it’s good for that. synapse does seem a bit inefficient but I guess you can’t do much about it

    • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      My experience is the same as yours, but I think the people complaining are the ones who are federated and are in large communities. Matrix apparently doesnt handle large rooms very well.

      • cactus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        fair enough, that’s true. it was one of the reasons I turned off federation, even on a beefy server synapse still lagged and timed out when I would join medium sized rooms.