"Pete #Hegseth’s big, urgent military summit will just be a “pep rally” for what he calls the “warrior ethos.” "

  • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s probably a good time for those generals and admirals to discuss how they will overthrow the soon to be despot.

    • Seleni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      The military is a machine, not a person. You point, click, and tell them what to shoot. That’s it. They don’t do political policy.

      And really, that’s a good thing if you think about it. Like it or not, Trump and his flunkies are in the White House because the majority of voters put them there, so when you get down to it, it’s the majority’s job to get rid of him if they don’t like him.

      I mean, do you really want the military to go, ‘hey, we know y’all elected this guy, but we don’t like him, so we’re going to just get rid of him’? Just because they’d be getting rid of a guy we don’t like this time doesn’t make it a good thing.

      • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean, do you really want the military to go, ‘hey, we know y’all elected this guy, but we don’t like him, so we’re going to just get rid of him’? Just because they’d be getting rid of a guy we don’t like this time doesn’t make it a good thing.

        No, but I do want them to refuse to follow illegal orders.

            • BigPotato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              To tell the Sec Def “No, I won’t be showing up” is deny a lawful order. Your boss can tell you to be somewhere.

              If the US Military starts to play political games, like denying an otherwise lawful order because it came from an asshole, they’re breaking different parts of their own internal rules.

              That said, if the civilian arm in charge of the military, e.g. the executive branch, decides to say that the Army can, and should, unilaterally bomb unidentified boats in their region for ‘defence purposes’, that’s now a lawful order so you can’t deny that one.

              And as an average joe, you can beat the rap (in thirty years when they pardon you) but you can’t beat the ride. Enjoy your DD.

          • Auli@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            I mean yes. Just because the president says something doesn’t make it legal. Now everything he says might be legal but who knows.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Their first loyalty is to the constitution. If they are given orders that violate the constitution then they are obligated to not obey them. If the president is abusing his power to destroy the constitution then they are obligated to protect it.

        Whatever orders they’re given come after this first responsibility.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        All those other countries who have had military coups should have told their militaries that they don’t do political policy.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            No, I’m saying “the military doesn’t do politics” is a dumb statement. Every military doesn’t do politics, until they do.

            Also North Korea didn’t have a military coup and they’d almost certainly be better off if they did, so not the best choice for comparison.

        • Ironfist79@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Read the entire oath. You are also sworn to obey the orders of the President and the officers appointed over you.

      • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Trump and his flunkies are in the White House because the majority of voters put them there,

        Incorrect. A majority of voters selected other candidates. Trump received 49.8% of the vote.

        • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I want to jump on the pedantry train. Around 36% of eligible voters didn’t cast a ballot for president, so if Trump received 49.8% of the vote, then - in the original terms of “x% of voters out Trump in the White House” - .498 * (1-0.36) = about 32% of voters. Meaning more eligible voters didn’t vote than selected Trump.

          The highest voter share went to “abstain”.

          • zbyte64@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            About as much as I love having 9 people appointed for life that can overrule that voting system in case it does actually let the majority win.

      • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you really think the US military is just a machine then I would like you to do a little research and find out what all the recent 3 and 4 star generals are doing after they retire. I can tell you they are not sippin pina coladas on Coronado.

      • Zexks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes. When they tell thr military “hey were throwing out the rukes you kill who we tell you no matter what”

        I expect them to immediately kill the threat in front of them. Not dance with them and try to negotiate.