• squaresinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          Let’s put it into math instead:

          Let S1 be the set of people who voted for Biden. Let S2 be the set of people who voted for Trump’s second term.

          S1 ∩ S2 ≠ {}

          If that’s not helpful, let’s try code:

          s1 = getPeopleWhoVotedForBiden()
          s2 = getPeopleWhoVotedForTrumpsSecondTerm()
          
          if (x for x in s1 if x in s2 > 0):
            print("There are more than enough people qualifying for for what I said")
          

          And lastly, to reformulate the sentence:

          There are lots of people who in 2020 voted for Biden and in 2024 voted for Trump.

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            hah, you looked up an intersection symbol, nice. And now I just cant help myself since you gave me that response…

            So of 152 million votes cast, you’d like to show a sample size of just 1 person or more proves your hypothesis? seems pretty biased against the null hypothesis.

            And your restatement of your hypothesis: “There are lots of people who in 2020 voted for Biden and in 2024 voted for Trump.”

            You are proving “lots” with > 1? thats just not what “lots” means in english.

            And I think we’re done here.