Summary

Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon revealed that MAGA operatives are “working on” securing Donald Trump a third presidential term in 2028, despite constitutional term limits.

In an interview with Chris Cuomo, Bannon said, “We’ll see what the definition of term limit is,” suggesting they’re exploring ways to circumvent the 22nd Amendment.

Recently released from prison after serving four months for contempt of Congress, Bannon placed second in a CPAC straw poll for 2028 GOP nominees behind JD Vance, while maintaining tensions with Trump adviser Elon Musk.

  • TipRing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 days ago

    We’ll see what the definition of term limit is

    It’s right there in the amendment:

    No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.

    Donald Trump was elected twice. He is ineligible to be elected again.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 days ago

      Yeah. The constitution also says anyone who starts a fucking insurrection is also ineligible and yet here we are.

    • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 days ago

      If I had to put money on it, I’d guess they contest the legitimacy of the next election, and he just refuses to step down - can only be elected twice, but he’s just there as a care taker until a proper election can happen

    • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Actually, reading the language again, I can absolutely see some shenanigans where he runs as VP for someone else who runs on a platform of “vote for me and I’ll immediately resign and put Trump in charge again”. It’d need the supreme court to decide if that “and” is exclusive or not, and given that half the court seems pretty happy to give up their principles of it suits their politics, I wouldn’t be surprised if that worked