I believe there were many “low information” voters who only knew they wanted change.
Where those voters might have wanted Biden Harris initiatives, those tended toward long term investments that people were not patient for or were not trumpeted as loudly. Improvements were neither visible nor immediate. Building is boring. Too many people never paid attention, wanted instant gratification or only heard the loudest voices.
It also has precedence, real world demonstration.
And it’s even something he’s thought about for a while rather than a momentary impulse or reaction. I wonder what the results of that study were.
The US stock market is fairly strong at encouraging innovation, new companies, growth. My employer is one of many that moved its headquarters here to take advantage of that innovation economy. I don’t like this one proposal on the grounds that it erodes yet another US advantage. We’ll be worse off for it.
But we do have examples of it working so it’s not the end of the world. This seems far less destructive than most of his actions