• 1 Post
  • 113 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle
  • In the 2010s, regulators in both the European Union and the United Kingdom stopped requiring companies to report quarterly results, moving to six-month reporting periods instead.

    It also has precedence, real world demonstration.

    In 2018, Trump urged the SEC to study moving to a six-month reporting system to “allow greater flexibility & save money.

    And it’s even something he’s thought about for a while rather than a momentary impulse or reaction. I wonder what the results of that study were.

    The US stock market is fairly strong at encouraging innovation, new companies, growth. My employer is one of many that moved its headquarters here to take advantage of that innovation economy. I don’t like this one proposal on the grounds that it erodes yet another US advantage. We’ll be worse off for it.

    But we do have examples of it working so it’s not the end of the world. This seems far less destructive than most of his actions


  • I believe there were many “low information” voters who only knew they wanted change.

    Where those voters might have wanted Biden Harris initiatives, those tended toward long term investments that people were not patient for or were not trumpeted as loudly. Improvements were neither visible nor immediate. Building is boring. Too many people never paid attention, wanted instant gratification or only heard the loudest voices.





  • But also consider human development. Someone always argues that China has also been building more coal power plant. However it’s reasonable when you’re bringing more of your population out of poverty. China has developed into a modern economy/society far faster than any other country in history and that’s a positive thing even if they rapidly increased energy consumption.

    More importantly all indications are China passing peak carbon emissions in the next year or two, far sooner than they committed to. How is everyone else doing on their commitments?

    I’m no fan of the abuses of their authoritarianism, but give credit where it’s due: they made some great decisions with renewable energy and followed through aggressively to all of our benefit






  • Wow, what pieces of shit. I had often wondered if it was just pride and sunk cost fallacy, but they’re pieces of shit

    Maybe I’m naive but I bought into it at first. Israel did suffer a horrible terrorist attack, their citizens were kidnapped, and terrorists were hiding among Palestinians, so a military response could be expected. But there’s got to be a point where they recognize the harm to innocent civilians, where enough is enough and they’ve long past it for most people. Yet still trying to justify it?


  • I most don’t get the part at the end about sabotaging port facilities. For this and other renewables there’s some consistency in fighting this weird vendetta. But I don’t get the parts about closing off the possibility of American manufacturing. This seems so contrary to the claimed premise of bringing manufacturing back to this country. This is where they contradict not just reality but also themselves

    We’ve hollowed out our economy with decades of outsourcing and it’s valid to do something about it (like with the chips act and infrastructure bills). And MAGAts claim they are. But how is actively sabotaging new manufacturing helping this goal?









  • I’m reasonably sure my company doesn’t pay attention to websites we click to as long as it doesn’t trigger any alerts but 100% it’s there in case they want to”reasons”

    One of my ex-co-workers did get fires with that as the reason, but wtf, don’t you have a phone? Why would you ever do personal stuff on company equipment. Even worse, we sell security software that does this! Did you really think we weren’t using it ourselves?