This isn’t hyperbole.

F to doubt

Thems my kinfolk and I’m sure I know which way they vote.

That county is basically rich conservatives and their staff. I’m sure he’ll win more popularity for talking tough.

They have incredible windows too

Who are ‘you guys’?

you never condemn israel is posts about their crime and just when it is compared with nazi you start arguing when israel methods and statements are very similar to each other

You’re fighting a strawman that you’ve created in your head that’s an amalgamation of every post you disagree with.

You’ve likely never seen anything that I’ve written before so you have no basis for anything that you’ve claimed. Implying that I’m pro-Zionist is very much incorrect.

They literally funded the Nazis and tried to ally with them. They are surely close enough to warrant the reminder of that fact.

The Haavara Agreement (Hebrew: הֶסְכֵּם הַעֲבָרָה, romanized: heskem haavara, lit. ‘transfer agreement’) was an agreement between Nazi Germany and Zionist organizations signed on 25 August 1933.

You’re grossly misrepresenting what the Haavara Agreement was.

From the Haavara Agreement wikipedia article:

In an arrangement with the Reich Economics Ministry, the blocked German bank accounts of prospective immigrants would be unblocked and funds from them used by Hanotea to buy agricultural German goods; these goods, along with the immigrants, would then go to Palestine, and the immigrants would be granted a house or citrus plantation by the company of the same value.

The Nazis frozen the accounts of German jews and the Haavara Agreement was an agreement that Jews would leave Germany in exchange for their funds being transferred with them. Nazi was still trying to find solutions to the “Jewish question” and this was seen as a way to coerce Jews into leaving.

This was not Zionists funding Nazi Germany or trying to ally with them. It was a Nazi tactic to financially coerce German jews to leave Germany.

I think that the term ‘Nazi’ needs to die.

These people are not members of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, aka Nazis. They are fascists.

Some of the members of this movement cosplay as Nazis, but they are not Nazis. We call these people, who wear Nazi symbols and glorify the Nazis, neoNazis

Using the term ‘Nazi’ to describe the fascists taking control of the US Government unnecessarily muddies the discussion on top of being factually incorrect. Words have meaning. Twisting the meaning of words in order to suit your political agenda is irresponsible, at best.

Call fascists fascists because that’s what they are. Don’t use a term that lets them red herring every conversation by turning it into an argument about the term ‘Nazi’.

It’s safest to assume that, if you’re posting on public social media, that your words will eventually be linked to your physical person.

When you’re talking about an entity like the US Government, it will have a lot of tools to de-anonymize you (See: Snowden).

It is safest for the average person to just assume that everything you’re posting on social media has your real-life name attached to it and that a federal law enforcement agent is reading what you post.

VPNs don’t help you from being browser fingerprinted or from zero-day exploits or any number of other attack types that can de-anonymize you. The Internet isn’t anonymous and hasn’t been for over a decade.

Trying to personally fight ignorance, which is being manufactured at industrial level, is a waste of time.

You’re better off spending your time finding like-minded people and organizing yourselves towards some attainable political goal (like electing local politicians that are not shit).

Trying to argue with bots/idiots on social media is a net loss.

-Written on a public social media website

Eventually people will become media savvy enough to recognize weasel words. In case you’re not:

‘Canada is considering joining the US’ is not wrong, it’s just misleading.

The reading that most people will take from it is “Cananda is considering joining the US and that consideration is leading them to join the US” as this is generally how ‘considering’ is used in English.

But, it isn’t technically untrue. The ‘Canada should join the US’ topic has been a pretty hot topic in Canada. Overwhelmingly people are against it, but you can’t be against something without considering it.

‘Considering’ is a weasel word that allows for people to imply one thing without technically lying.

You’ll also see ‘after’ used a lot as a weasel word.

“Stock prices fall after oil futures increase” implies a causal link (i.e. that oil futures rising caused stock prices to fall) when, technically, it only states a temporal link: Oil Futures rose and then 24 hours later Stock prices fell. So stock prices fell after oil futures increased.

It’s just as technically correct to write “Stock prices rise after local farmer’s prized cow gives birth”. Sure, those are two things that happened and the sentence is describing the correct order of things but it implies that these two events are linked in some way.

Hopefully this makes you one of today’s lucky 10,000