The US has been on the losing side of every major military conflict they’ve been involved in since 1945, their current leaders believe that streak dates back to 1865.

2025 is bang on with that cadence.

Until there is legitimate, sustained, and effective opposition to this Alligator Auschwitz, the rest of the world sees it as American as apple pie and school shootings.

It’s speed running to the wrong side of history.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I’ve found the most difficult concept to dislodge from the terminally disengaged is that there’s no such thing as taxpayer money at the federal level.

It’s a tremendously useful weapon for those in power to wield when they need to convince the poor to vote against their interests.

The states are currency users, and as such are intrinsically subservient to the currency issuer, namely the federal government.

The US federal government doesn’t need whatever money the states, or anyone else, pays it. Every cent a currency issuer receives is instantly obliterated from the economy, and conversely the origin of every cent is conjured out of thin air by their budget.

That said, the states withholding federal payments could work on the chucklefucks currently in charge, because many of them are likely to believe strongly in the fiction of zero-sum economics, but I’d hazard a critical mass hold a world view built on some other fantastical hallucination from hotboxing their collective farts.

The US hasn’t been a country anyone should treat seriously since 2024-11-05, and won’t be again until they can prove their ability to hold another legitimate election.

It’s a coin flip as to whether I’ll see that within my lifetime right now.

Seniority should demote individuals, from positions of power, to those of advisory.

Privilege readily blinds those who experience it.

Authoritarianism is most attractive to the weakest.

Religion is the most destructive human invention.

I’m not into kink shaming, unless practicing it inflicts harm in a non-consensual manner.

Mountainhead [2025].

Low birth rates are problematic to carcinogenic ideologies.

Positioning the increase in population as a core tenet for a system condemns it to resource exhaustion.

I’m all for providing the option to ‘procreate’ where it’s appropriate and non-coercive, but demanding it as a requirement for acceptable incorporation into society should always be disparaged and ridiculed.