• Libra00@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    I mean, not really? If I delegate a bunch of people who work for me to go take care of something, I expect them to take care of it and report back, not send me an exhaustive list of everything they did to accomplish it including which apps they used to discuss arrangements. Much as I hate defending Trump about anything, no president has the time or energy to keep track of what his underlings are doing to such a level of detail.

      • Libra00@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Well yeah, he’s clearly responsible for putting idiots in power, I’m just saying he can’t manage their daily shit.

    • xenomor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m not talking about the inciting incident, I’m talking about the reporting on the incident. If there is a meaningful security breach related to US military operations, the president sure needs to be aware of it, especially if it being reported on in public.

    • lunarul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      If I delegate someone to do something and they fuck up majorly, I expect to be the first to know.

    • ...m...@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      …this is why competent administrations rigorously implement, enforce, and prosecute information security: the very idea of using a personal device for state communication is anathema to that core competency…

      • Libra00@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Oh yeah, I know the US government has secure comms specifically for this purpose so not using it is a clusterfuck of pretty epic proportions, no doubt.