• kevin____@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Don’t stop there. Let’s hear what you think he should have done so we can evaluate your argument on its merits instead of the strawman you’ve constructed.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Well, just to name a few:

      • sack Garland after it became apparent that he was not fit for purpose. Better yet, he shouldn’t have even picked him
      • sack DeJoy (do not give me that bullshit about how “his hands were tied” - that’s demonstrably a matter of interpretation)
      • GOP wants to lean into the maximalist interpretation of executive power? Maliciously comply.
      • pack the court

      I can go on, at length, but I’m sure you’re starting to get the point.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        sack Garland after it became apparent that he was not fit for purpose. Better yet, he shouldn’t have even picked him

        Garland did the job he was hired to do. He slow walked the investigation so biden could run against trump again.