The WSJ published this on Thursday. However, it didn’t include an image of the card, only the text and a description. From all the sources I’ve seen, the original image has not been released. It is possible that someone only leaked a written report to the WSJ and they dont even have a photo of it. I suspect all these photos are fake, but since Trump will likely sue for defamation, I don’t believe this story would have been published without a high certainty of the text’s authenticity.
Maxwell collected letters from Trump and dozens of Epstein’s other associates for a 2003 birthday album, according to documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.
The letter bearing Trump’s name, which was reviewed by the Journal, is bawdy—like others in the album.
In matches the description of what I think it was the New York Post put out. I don’t think they released an image of it, at least not when I first saw it. This could be someone’s recreation based off the description possibly. Idk.
Is this real? I can’t find it anywhere else.
The WSJ published this on Thursday. However, it didn’t include an image of the card, only the text and a description. From all the sources I’ve seen, the original image has not been released. It is possible that someone only leaked a written report to the WSJ and they dont even have a photo of it. I suspect all these photos are fake, but since Trump will likely sue for defamation, I don’t believe this story would have been published without a high certainty of the text’s authenticity.
It’s a birthday card, it’s been tossed decades ago. This is a mockup from a first hand memory of the card.
That’s not what is being reported.
In matches the description of what I think it was the New York Post put out. I don’t think they released an image of it, at least not when I first saw it. This could be someone’s recreation based off the description possibly. Idk.
There’s another version of the image floating around, it’s slightly different. At least one of them must be fake.
lol this looks like a Dr Seuss character.
According to the WSJ, it is signed only “Donald” and the signature implies pubic hair. The OPs version matches that, yours does not.
Good point, but the other one could also be fake too.