The White House is eyeing redistricting efforts beyond Texas to help Republicans hold the U.S. House in 2026 — and Democrats are preparing to escalate in response, with one senator vowing to go “nuclear” if needed.

What’s shaping up to be a multistate redistricting battle could mark the opening round for House control ahead of next year’s midterms, when Democrats see retaking the House as the party’s best chance to break Republicans’ hold on Congress and President Donald Trump is determined to keep the GOP’s majority. Democrats, under pressure from their base to match GOP tactics, have grown more forceful in their messaging and are taking concrete steps to push back, even as the party enters at a disadvantage.

“If they’re going to go nuclear, then so am I,” said Sen. Elissa Slotkin. “They’re forcing us into this position because they’re trying to pick their voters.”

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, to be fair, the Dems only say they’re gonna ‘go nuclear’ when they have no hope of winning. They had 4 years to box an orange turd and right the ship. Guess that was too much.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      There’s no sleeping. You’re straight up walking into fascism with your eyes wide open.

  • Matt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Democrats are where they are because they like following rules. Republicans have an objective and want to see it finished. Following rules and decorum for 60 years has gotten Democrats nowhere. Democrats have to play by Republican standards otherwise the results will keep getting worse.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Democrats are where they are because they like following rules.

      Nnnnnoooo, they follow the rules because they’re the rules. If it’s just total anarchy you want, any political party won’t scratch that itch.

  • karashta@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    How about calling for and organizing a nation wide general strike???

    Oh right, that would hurt their billionaire donors and actually accomplish things for the working class.

    They act like they have no power but hand wringing. But that’s because that’s all they choose to do.

    • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      The ruling class has spent the last century or so systematically dismantling the American left. Unfortunately the Democrats are a right wing party and have no interest in this kind of disruption - they’re just as owned by billionaires as the Republicans are, it’s just a more polite faction of capitalists.

  • omgboom@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Democrats are sharpening their pencils and are going to write the sternest letter anyone has ever seen

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    This and many other actions lead me to believe that the US is never getting rid of this administration. They’ve deleted all safety mechanisms and all possible checks and balances, of course in their favor. Even if you get elections, I doubt the results matter.

    As Stalin once famously said “I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this—who will count the votes, and how.”

    • ThatsTheSpirit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It would be revealing themselves as the new bolshevik party then handing guns ammo and body armor out to registered dems along with a copy of state&revolution…maybe some marching orders even i dunno. You asked for nuclear (;

    • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Redraw California, New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Washington, and Oregon districts to overwhelm the handful of Republican districts there.

      Then

      Take full advantage of the fact that the R’s are pushing a very unpopular agenda and will have to weaken their advantages in red districts (making them a bit swingier) in order to get rid of blue districts.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      The short answer is gerrymandering California, but you don’t stop corruption with equal and opposite corruption. I’m afraid we don’t have an opposition party willing to do what is necessary to actually fight corruption.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        but you don’t stop corruption with equal and opposite corruption.

        This is why we will always be at a disadvantage.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          That depends on how you play the game. Stopping corruption begins with calling it out and demanding it end. You can’t cower in the corner because you “lack the votes” or because public opinion isn’t behind you. Doing what is right means you will lose a lot of battles, but you’re always fighting.

  • Master167@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Take the population, plug it into a video game map generator, tell it to make all population of sections equal, generate 30 variations, and put them to a vote.

  • queueBenSis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    it still blows my mind that the majority party being able to redraw district lines to stay in power is somehow legal.

    • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It still blows my mind that Americans are still pointing at shit saying “that’s illegal” when the law hasn’t mattered for like a decade.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Legal” is just a label the people in power put on the things they want to do. We don’t have a functioning justice system, and I’m not certain we ever did.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Blame the SCOTUS. At least some states like Pennsylvania had their courts rule gerrymandering as unconstitutional (for their state, not federally). Unfortunately, a lot of other states still gladly allow it.

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Our supreme court in ohio ruled the state drawn districts were illegal 3 times in 2021-2022, but nothing was done about it and the illegal maps were used in the elections.

        Also it’s completely unrelated that the governor’s son is a supreme court justice.