The fact global shipping now treats “possible closure of the Strait of Hormuz” as something that can be worked around is honestly kind of insane on its own.

  • ms.lane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Where does most global shipping go to and from?

    China.

    Who isn’t affected by the closure of the strait at all?

    China.

    Good work Trump, America First!

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      China depends on Iranian oil, which is why Iran tried the partial blockade to let friendly ships through. That forced the US to try and enforce a full blockade to prevent China from being less affected than everyone else.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      This is a really shoddily written article. Bad. Basically he’s saying that fuel costs will remain high and from a business standpoint the risk doesn’t go to zero just because Trump says everything is rainbows. Therefore shipping faces increased costs, which raises prices for consumers, which hurts demand, which lowers shipping volume. And that systemic slowdown doesn’t disappear overnight because Trump says yippee.

      I think. If the article weren’t total shit, maybe it would be clearer.

      • AshMan85@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        The billionaires are telling us we will continue to pay the increased costs. Prices never went back to normal after lockdowns ended. They are doing the same shit.

    • Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fuel/oil Maersk, if I recall, does container shipping and has other ways of moving boxes, but all of them burn fuel