At least for the first 30 pages, it appears this is a heavily notated version of the original document, so fail on that.
Secondly (again first 30 of 196 pages) it’s clear Harris list with men
Thirdly, russian-asset Jill Stein stole a fuckton of shithead voters (+11% of men in in NC) and that’s crazy, but leads to:
Fourthly, noted as “unsourced”, the report says Democrats assumed Trumps insane incompetence, outright fascist mindset, and unhinged corrupt nature, along with being a rapist, often of children, would have delivered more votes for Harris than it did. They suggested more attack ads.
I don’t think this is incorrect, but I still can’t fathom it. How are so many people so fucking ignorant of basic critical skills. There’s no one answer.
Maybe it days in the other 160 pages.
So it’s just a pile of useless garbage because Martin hired a buddy to do it part-time instead of bringing in an independent investigator and he hid it because it’s embarrassingly bad, but still tried to talk-up its importance even as he knew it was drivel until he was forced to release it and be revealed to be even more dishonest and incompetent than we already suspected.
But reading between the lines, it looks like the whole thing was intended as an effort to hide that Biden’s unconditional support for Israel probably cost them the election which would have been determined by a real investigator so he intentionally brought in his buddy to fuck the thing up and muddy the waters so they can ‘move on’ and ‘not think about what went wrong too much’.