xc2215x@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoAndrew Tate sues Meta, TikTok for over $50 million for deplatforming himglobalnews.caexternal-linkmessage-square24linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkAndrew Tate sues Meta, TikTok for over $50 million for deplatforming himglobalnews.caxc2215x@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square24linkfedilink
minus-squareicystar@lemmy.cif.sulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agoI hope he wins, or at least costs the companies as much money as possible. This censorship needs to end.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agoTate deserves less than nothing. Other people deserve a voice. https://www.hrw.org/report/2023/12/21/metas-broken-promises/systemic-censorship-palestine-content-instagram-and
minus-squareicystar@lemmy.cif.sulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agoPeople should have a voice even if they use it to say things you don’t like.
minus-squarephutatorius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 hours agoTate’s running a business. He doesn’t deserve free advertising. If he doesn’t meet the TOS, tough shit.
minus-squarepoopkins@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agoThese are privately owned services. Forcing them to be a platform for specific voices is the opposite of what you’re advocating for. As for myself, I’d prefer to live in a society where voices of hate and bigotry are not amplified.
minus-squarephutatorius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 hours agoThere needs to be a distinction between the right to free speech and the right to a massive megaphone and 50 kwatt PA system. You can go out in the street and say whatever the hell you like. You can set up your own website and do the same.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agoHe can have a voice, but he doesn’t necessarily deserve to be paid. Gaza reporters are being censored and they aren’t even asking for money.
I hope he wins, or at least costs the companies as much money as possible.
This censorship needs to end.
Tate deserves less than nothing.
Other people deserve a voice.
https://www.hrw.org/report/2023/12/21/metas-broken-promises/systemic-censorship-palestine-content-instagram-and
People should have a voice even if they use it to say things you don’t like.
Tate’s running a business. He doesn’t deserve free advertising. If he doesn’t meet the TOS, tough shit.
These are privately owned services. Forcing them to be a platform for specific voices is the opposite of what you’re advocating for.
As for myself, I’d prefer to live in a society where voices of hate and bigotry are not amplified.
There needs to be a distinction between the right to free speech and the right to a massive megaphone and 50 kwatt PA system. You can go out in the street and say whatever the hell you like. You can set up your own website and do the same.
He can have a voice, but he doesn’t necessarily deserve to be paid.
Gaza reporters are being censored and they aren’t even asking for money.