

This censorship is clear evidence of anti-masochism.
This censorship is clear evidence of anti-masochism.
I call for violence against masochistics
One goal was to increase defense burden-sharing with allies. but withdraw from NATO wasn’t a project goal.
I wish the ironic gift of Trump’s grandfather’s German birth certificate hadn’t gone straight over the heads.
Thanks. Google was serving me nothing but slop
So that a reason can be given to not enrich further.
it makes it trivialize easy to issue any number of tokens (trillions? quadrillions? 2^64?) and then trade with them.
These are all fully visible. Gift cards we have no way of knowing how many there are.
Gift cards still have the limitation that you need a network to accept them,
Same with tokens. Only certain people will redeem certain tokens.
and they are commonly understood in accounting practices so retailers need to account for them.
Public blockchains are a triple ledger system. They are self accounting
How can we be sure that some random stablecoin is really backed by currency 1:1 like they claim?
Great question. Same with gift cards. Same with bonds.
The largest stablecoin in use today is Tether, which claims to have over $100B in circulation, all “backed 1:1”. But every audit they have released has been deficient in some way.
Oh yes. I wouldn’t touch Tether with a 12ft pole. I’m not saying stablecoins are good. I’m saying they are no different to what currently exists.
Yes. Gift cards is probably a better analogy.
My main point is that this sort of thing isn’t new. The crypto part is a distraction.
These are called defined benefit pensions.
bill allows bank subsidiaries and big tech companies to issue their own stablecoins.
These are usually called corporate bonds. What is the fuss?
Did he want a high BMI or a low BMI?
If we just claim ownership of our rivals money without moving it from their safe, we can commit the crime of the century.
Israel backs any party likely to win.
Al gebra - ‘the reunion of broken parts’,
Yes. Gping further. If you really want to minimise plant deaths then you remove all animals (including humans).
My main point is that empathy and it’s focus depends very much on the individual. Empathy is a strong emotional argument but a weak logical one.
If people bring up vegetarianism in an empathy debate then no-one can stop me empathising with the carrot.
Weekend against Bernie