Tulsi Gabbard left no doubt when she testified to Congress about Iran’s nuclear program earlier this year.

The country was not building a nuclear weapon, the national intelligence director told lawmakers, and its supreme leader had not reauthorized the dormant program even though it had enriched uranium to higher levels.

But Donald Trump dismissed the assessment of U.S. spy agencies during an overnight flight back to Washington as he cut short his trip to the Group of Seven summit to focus on the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran.

“I don’t care what she said,” Trump told reporters. In his view, Iran was “very close” to having a nuclear bomb.

  • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    The best hint that Iran has no nukes is that the US is attacking them. If they had nukes they would keep away.

    • Doom@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes she works for Russia and they’re friends with Iran.

      So we can’t really trust either.

      • d00ery@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I think he’s possibly talking at the UN or some security council as they plaque in front of him says “United States”, at a guess that wouldn’t be necessary in front of Congress. I might be wrong though, I’m not from the US.

      • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s Secretary of State Colin Powell testifying to Congress about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, during the Bush Jr. administration, I think.

        • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s not Congress. It’s the UN. And he was doing a really stupid publicity stunt about how that vial could hold anthrax to kill them all. And then went on about WMDs in Iraq.

        • frostysauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s Secretary of State Colin Powell testifying lying to Congress about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, during the Bush Jr. administration, I think.

          I had to.

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    yeeeah… shrug, Trump ignores them all. And why shouldn’t he? They didn’t prevent him from happening, what’s the point of the CIA, NSA etc when they either knew about him & putin, and let hit happen, or, they didn’t know, even though it’s been obvious since the 80s?

    Nice job Intel community, you shot us all in the face.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have read a little bit about the construction of a Nuclear Bomb and i must say, they’re surprisingly simple to make.

    Essentially, you take a bunch of radioactive material, and above a certain threshold purity and threshold amount, it just starts a chain reaction that makes it explode.

    So, yes, enriching uranium to very high degrees is the essential step to build a bomb.

    It could very well be that Iran wasn’t officially building a bomb, i.e. they didn’t tell their engineers yet “ok, let’s assemble all the pieces into a complete bomb” but it is well possible that they were preparing all the pieces.

    • wpb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      it is well possible that they were preparing all the pieces

      You’re literally describing building a bomb with different words. And both the IAEA and the American IC are currently of the opinion that Iran hasn’t been doing that since they suspended their nuclear weapons program in 2003. Is there something you know that they don’t?

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Essentially, you take a bunch of radioactive material, and above a certain threshold purity and threshold amount, it just starts a chain reaction that makes it explode.

      No. That is not what enriching means. I’m sorry, you need to do a lot more research on nuclear physics; you are flatly incorrect.

  • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Tulsi Gabbard is a well known Iranian asset. She’s been on their payroll for years. Of course she said that they weren’t building a nuclear weapon, that’s what they paid her to say. The entire Trump regime is corrupt.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Lol, she’s a literal Hindu nationalist. That’s about as far from an Iranian asset as possible

      I love people putting “well known” before completely baseless accusations

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’ve heard the accusation that she’s a Russian asset, but Iranian? First time I’ve ever heard that one.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The moron just wants the war to hide his shenaningans at home. Sole reason. Everyone should know by now that he automatically denies any and every thing that runs contrary to his own personal narrative.

  • lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    wasn’t YET building?

    I mean… Why do you even get the uranium enriched to such high levels if you don’t plan to make use of it?

    • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Despite your shitlib stance, I will concede that Iran should gave veen trying to build a nuke as a deterrent for exactly this scenario. The US never attacks nuclear powers. Trump even sucks off Kim Jong Un on weekend getaways.

    • Batman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Power plants fueling desalination. There is alot of material about it. It’s part of the treaties with America. But to refine to weapon grade uranium is not a technological enhancement, you simply run the same enrichment procedure multiple times is my understanding. The main difference is the tricky detonation, but come on, that’s decades old tech.

      The treaties were made with the understanding they could make nukes if they wanted to.

  • Robotsandstuff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    We have done this dance before last time it cost me my 20s my sanity and most importantly a huge amount for friends I loved like brothers who died before and are still killing then selfs…