Hogg, who has levied harsh criticism over elderly Democrats' refusals to step down from their posts, will continue supporting primaries against senior members.

Told to resign from the vice chair or resign from calling out bad octogenarian DNC members. And then they made the decision for him.

Apparently DNC chair Ken Martin cried to Hogg that his chances of raising money and looking like a leader has been crushed by this, in a leaked call.
Ignoring that this is a projection and example of his leadership.

As a reminder 3 members of the DNC have died over the age of 70 this year already.

  • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
    0·
    2 days ago

    his chances of raising money and looking like a leader

    Note that raising money is the first thing mentioned.

    And note that winning elections isn’t mentioned at all.

    Which neatly sums up what’s wrong with the DNC.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      0·
      2 days ago

      The only messages I got as a registered Dem in NY was requests for money. It was the only way to defeat Trump according to whatever intern was setting up the mass text.

      Fucking pathetic.

      • silence7@lemmy.world
        0·
        2 days ago

        The way you achieve more is typically showing up at your local Democratic Club meetings or county party meetings.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lolOP
      0·
      2 days ago

      Full quote

      “I’ll be very honest with you, for the first time in my 100 days on this job … the other night I said to myself for the first time, I don’t know if I wanna do this anymore,” he said in a May 15 Zoom meeting of DNC officers.
      “No one knows who the hell I am, right? I’m trying to get my sea legs underneath of me and actually develop any amount of credibility so I can go out there and raise the money and do the job I need to to put ourselves in a position to win,” Martin said, addressing Hogg. “And again, I don’t think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to. So it’s really frustrating.”

      It really is frustrating that he thinks the only way to position to win is cash in the bank and no question of the effectiveness of members of the party. Especially when we have such a limited number of positions we can fill.

      I think he just liked having an easy answer to why it’s not going well in the existence of David Hogg.

      • neatchee@lemmy.world
        0·
        2 days ago

        I’ll take the downvotes to point out the political reality:

        Raising money is literally the DNC’s primary role. It is a coalition of people raising money collaboratively, with the understanding that agreeing to the party policy as a group is a requirement for being a member of the group.

        So when he says that Hogg is stealing his spotlight and making it difficult to build the network he needs to raise funds, he’s not out of line.

        He is INCREDIBLY shortsighted in failing to connect “supporting good candidates” with “ability to secure votes” which itself is a necessary component of long term fundraising. But let’s call a spade a spade: raising money is what the DNC is all about, by definition, and without those funds they have no purpose, let alone ability to promote candidates

        • barneypiccolo@lemm.eeEnglish
          0·
          1 day ago

          With David Hogg with the DNC, I was considering donating, but I won’t now.

          Hogg gets it. The Democratic party needs to defund the spineless weenies like Schumer, and focus on young, strong candidates that are willing to stand up to the traitors.

          Wherever Hogg lands, that’s where I’ll be deploying my money.

        • obre@lemmy.world
          0·
          2 days ago

          I don’t think we really disagree given what you said about shortsightedness, but I feel like ranting.

          The focus on corporate lobbyist and billionaire donations is the cancer that will kill the country. Fundraising through grassroots outreach and organization can be much more effective than spending billions in blood money on TV ads and landline phonecalls, but it requires a platform that taps into the zeitgeist and galvanizes the public to act. In our current moment that means earnestly fighting for social programs, civil rights, and democratic governance - all of which conflicts with the interests of the ruling class.

          The DNC is too far gone at this point. They’ve ignored the popular will for so long and embraced corporatism so nakedly that they enabled fascism by granting its veneer of populism more luster.

          They squandered any good will they could have gained from wholeheartedly supporting popular policies and any trust they could have engendered with a consistently progressive track record. They lost any respect they could have earned from fighting tooth and nail against oppression, and any momentum they could have raised within the institution from fostering a new generation of energetic idealists. Take all that away and what you’re left with is a staid orthodoxy that is begrudged, distrusted, spineless, and out of touch.

          The only thing they have to fall back on at this point is ‘not being as bad as overt fascists’ and ‘being reasonably complement stewards of an economy designed to funnel money to the wealthy’. We’ve seen that this is not a good strategy for winning elections, but does a hell of a job at driving voter apathy, powerlessness, and resentment.

          /rant

      • Zenith@lemm.ee
        0·
        2 days ago

        When a government can no longer serve you it will turn to spectacle to keep you from noticing