What a sad question when you remove the snark from it.

Like honestly, the reality behind that is just sad.

It’s really not much of a statement to say someone out there has that opinion. There will always be extreme people with extreme takes meant to be so. and a lot of people that disagree with you. Do not mistake it for more common just because you see it, and do not mistake others sympathy for victims of atrocities as more than that.

You think it’s wrong, that’s your opinion on it. But maybe just argue with the people doing it that you disagree with instead of deciding all the people that don’t agree with you are in on it.

Are you imagining a specific audience when you say this?

You downvote me for agreeing that Schumer needed to be primaried but noting the nuance of the infighting that would happen from it? You even responded so it added to the conversation. Sorry just seems odd use of that.

I think the people would agree and he would win the appearance game but I think the party would close ranks hard on anyone saying anything against Schumer and he would be ousted completely and smeared.

I agree he didn’t have a second punch ready I just think no second punch would be big enough yet. Wish it was more of a fight but the DNC operates as unit when it’s their own money and appearance on the line.

3 months short for me but that’s because it took me that long to figure out how Lemmy worked.

I guess my question is, whether you can say Chuck Schumer needs to be primaried within a party who elected him as minority leader?

There is of course actually better options as well but they too have friends and calling out names with their resources and lack of conviction of other party members it paints a target on you.
Blue conservatives have their own friends and he did not. I’d probably stumble my way through as well trying to find a path forward. I think the problem is there is none while the culture is so against even treating it like a proper job instead of a club.

He wasn’t prepared but I think the end result would likely be the same.

Full quote

“I’ll be very honest with you, for the first time in my 100 days on this job … the other night I said to myself for the first time, I don’t know if I wanna do this anymore,” he said in a May 15 Zoom meeting of DNC officers.
“No one knows who the hell I am, right? I’m trying to get my sea legs underneath of me and actually develop any amount of credibility so I can go out there and raise the money and do the job I need to to put ourselves in a position to win,” Martin said, addressing Hogg. “And again, I don’t think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to. So it’s really frustrating.”

It really is frustrating that he thinks the only way to position to win is cash in the bank and no question of the effectiveness of members of the party. Especially when we have such a limited number of positions we can fill.

I think he just liked having an easy answer to why it’s not going well in the existence of David Hogg.

It’s wild that they view their age and incumbency issues as unrelated to their performance in the past decade.
As, apparently, doing and saying nothing to upset status quo is the standard of the current party and has been said so by new Chair Ken Martin.

It literally means no push for better candidates that better represent the people for one thing and doesn’t even begin to get into the number of DNC party members who have died in office in the past years of age related issues.

I really appreciate the onomatopoeia of “crash” finishing his sentence. It’s a really clever use of panel flow, and let’s it really sell the motion.

Enough other compliments have been made about how funny it is so I’m gonna nerd on your technical skills instead.

I do wish their was some more texture to the meat stick throne, but that’s just cause I find the visual idea to be funny.

Cause you could have said you looked up the episode and found nothing. The mention of ChatGPT basically functions as an ad for it and also points out how garbage it is while avoiding the conversation you could have with the real people here that would be happy for it. This kinda the point of a forum board with a comment section.

We aren’t hung up on it. Just pointing out its stupidity in being brought up and that we don’t care about your previous unrelated and unhelpful chat bot experience.

Anyways. No. Not real, it’s a joke. Insert funny human response here.

Hey, fuck them.
Don’t let others ideas of who is part of their in group and who can be excluded get to your empathy. I am glad you have it even if you don’t see it from anyone else today ( and hopefully I am wrong and you see lots). For every person you give comfort to today for being a good person in a bad place I thank you on their behalf even if they don’t.

If only we could excuse away the terrible people as unhuman but unfortunately that’s likely all him and fully representative of the bullshit people can think up and treat as reality.

The lemmings here do it all the time too.

All we hear is,
Disgraceful MAGA,
Upset Mama,
Nonsense Gaga!

Darn. I meant to imply the literal opposite of it after seeing all the comments saying women can’t win. But second comment seems to have read it exactly that way as well so I definitely didn’t manage my sarcastic annoyance with those comments right.

On me.

Women do not underperform in elections compared to men

Peoples insistence in blaming it is inherently sexist and my pointing that out does not make me an arbuter just willing to look at reality.

Wait what? I’m saying they got the votes cause people are generally not racist or sexist. Hillary got the votes cause people didn’t care about her gender but she didn’t win cause they managed to divide the electorate by her somewhat cavalier attitude towards widwestern states that she basically didn’t campaign in.

Im saying all the people saying Harris couldn’t win cause they are saying she had color or was a woman is the ones being both sexist or racist.

There is a shocking amount of sexism and racism in here for Lemmy supposedly being left leaning.

Literally contrary to evidence people just want to blame it on their own subconscious prejudice I guess cause if they are struggling with it everyone else must be, instead of just listening to the answers that are given.

He mentions air jordans as an incentive. Literally the only more racist thing would be saying he can have slave eunichs because he gives them watermelon.

People seem to forget that and think they own the limit in what is related conversation. I could talk about how I knew a group of people that looked exactly like these neckbeards and talk about their hygeine. Somehow acceptable but other works from the artist and a mention of their use of absurdist tone?

It feels it’s not about conversation here often, but an actual competition to be the most analytical and factual.
I’d rather comments be part of the open conversation.

I have now come to notice their is no towel emoji and the world is a little dimmer.
All the power our planet can scrape to give us and I can’t even remind people they could be a cool frood for knowing where their towel is?