• SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    That came after the United States Tennis Association sent a memo to media partners requesting that they censor “disruptions or reactions” in response to Trump. “We ask all broadcasters to refrain from showcasing any disruptions or reactions in response to the President’s attendance in any capacity,” the USTA said in the memo.

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s funny to read yesterday’s headline, aka this quote, and then read today’s headline. Everyone is going to boo him tomorrow, please don’t talk about it. He was in fact boo’ed, let’s talk about it.

      I guess funny is the wrong word. Insanity?

      • fluxion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        This is what happens when you involve yourself in someone’s war against reality and rational thinking

        • MimicJar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s good to know. It just looked so weird. I knew what I wrote was also weird, but it felt less weird.

          • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Basically apostrophes are never used to separate a word from a normal suffix in this kind of novel or unusual construction. Pretty much just use apostrophes for contractions and (most) possessives. Example: 90s, not 90’s.

            • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              So if you said you were a 90’s child, wouldn’t that be okay? (As you are a child of/possessed by the 90s) A nineties’ child, if you will?

            • Soup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              And, actually, I believe it’s ‘90s! So there is one, it’s right in front.

              • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                '90s is a contraction of 1990s, or whatever other century’s tenth decade is implied. So the apostrophe belongs as an example of a contraction or possessive :)

              • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                Just 90s if it’s a reference to someone’s age. And the apostrophe for referencing the 90s era is optional outside of formal writing and a dash can also be used e.g.; 90s-music depending on context.

              • Zachariah@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                But your apostrophe is upside down (it became a curved single-open-quote in your version). It’s supposed to be this way:

                ’90s