Obama’s comments appear in a new video supporting Gavin Newsom’s Proposition 50 which would allow the California legislature to draw new congressional boundaries ahead of the midterms

Barack Obama has entered the political fray ahead of November’s special election in California, accusing Republicans of attempting to “rig the next election” in a new ad backing Governor Gavin Newsom’s Proposition 50, a ballot measure that could reshape the state’s congressional map.

“Republicans want to steal enough seats in Congress to rig the next election and wield unchecked power for two more years,” Obama says in the 30-second ad, urging voters to approve the proposal. “You can stop Republicans in their tracks.”

  • mrdown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    When are you going to endorse Zohran and new bloods of couragous young democrats trying to reshape the party?

  • Squeebah@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wheeew boy. I just spent some time in progressive politics and jeez. They literally say Obama is the SAME level of evil as Hitler and Kamala is FAR right. This place seems so much more realistic.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    The voting machines now in Republican control are a give away that they will rig the elections. We should have the UN look at how the ballots are processed in this coming election just to be sure.

  • lack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I like how it’s still “accuses” and is not “confirming” after all the actions taken by project 2025 ghouls to rig the election since orange man waddled back up to the white house

  • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Reading the comments, it seems a lot of people here are totally fine to make good the enemy of perfect and repeat history all over again.

    Enjoy the fascism folks. We’re in it for the long haul it seems.

    • mrdown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      People want more people lime Zohran. Where is Zohran endorsment? Enjoy facism folks

    • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Welcome to the left. A leftist’s favorite passtime is telling other people that they are not left enough. They’d tell Karl Marx he isn’t left enough if he lost his right arm. Drives me nuts.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      The US requires a hard reset imo. The US political discourse is heavily biased towards the right causing the ratchet effect and muddies the pool of water of ideas. Liberals and progressives can’t get along because the term socialism in the country has been heavily demonized, that socialists and progressives alike have no choice but to side with the pseudo-left party that is the Democratic Party. The party exploits the lack of choice to be complacent and provide bread crumb policies. Meanwhile, conservatives and the right typically prefer order in spite of differences, so they tend to have stronger voting cohesion to elect the Republican party.

      The US requires a hard reset so that the two party system is rid of and political variety will blossom. Actually popular policies will be enacted and not demonized. Progressives could decouple from the Democratic party and finally call themselves socialists without the taboo. And moderate conservatives could dissociate themselves from the far right. However, this hard reset could mean a lead up to a civil war and the only people who would benefit from this are Russia and China.

      • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        No. I’m just now explaining that those who chose not to learn from the past are doomed to repeat it.

  • PKscope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I love how the majority of comments here didn’t even read the whole headline, let alone the article, before confidently spouting whatever they already thought.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve been watching republicans do illegal things my entire life. Nobody has ever stopped them

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Some judges have.

      Some people like the ACLU and Marc Elias have.

      Etc.

      Stopped all illegal things they do? No. But many real people have stopped many real things.

  • Surp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Maybe it’s just me but it almost seems like OP was trying to make this title seem bad as if it’s not the truth.

  • Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m expecting them to pull some bullshit that lets them “postpone” the election when the time comes.

  • Godric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Holy shit, the number of whiney comments crying about Newsom when the ad is about prop 50 is staggering.

    I would think that people were illiterate if they didn’t read “Newsom” and start blindly frothing at the mouth.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Recognizing names is far from literate, a 4 year old can do that easy. In fact illiteracy almost necessitates that you be able to recognize names and symbols and be able to associate a feeling with it to navigate the world. This name hurts me, avoid. This other symbol brings me pleasure, engage. So navigating by emotion rather than reason.

  • TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    All this astrofurfing and campaigning for Newsom is just a proactive effort to preempt any radical voices from gaining traction from the anti-Trump momentum. That’s the top of their agenda right now, institutional integrity and democracy is at best second.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      this has little to do with campaigning for newsom… it’s about supporting the counter to republican gerrymandering

      you might be right in general, but this is not that context

    • pahlimur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is a great example of “the left” being manipulated to turn on itself. Newsom ain’t great but he is better than anything my former party Republicans put forth. If he makes it through the primaries, please for the love of Satan vote for him in the general. If Republicans win again it’s completely over. If I were still one I’d be completely OK with so many worse things happening. Be more scared of what is yet to come than a groveling centrist like Newsom.

      • Michael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        This is a great example of “the left” being manipulated to turn on itself.

        Yeah, Obama is dividing the left with another power play. People don’t want Newsom for a number of reasons. People want to vote for an actual leader who has principles.

        • pahlimur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Vote for him in the general regardless. Why is this so hard? Vote in the primary and show up in the general. Our voting system is so simple.

          • Michael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I couldn’t vote for Bernie Sanders in the 2020 primary because of Obama’s power play. Convincing effectively all candidates to drop out and endorse Biden was election interference.

            Our voting system is already rigged and the person warning that Republicans are rigging the next election is responsible, in part.

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            Nah, that just encourages them to ratfuck progressives. I am not voting for Newsom in the general.

      • EldenLord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        You both can be right with these seemingly opposed stances. Doesn‘t matter actually, all that matters is that the left is divided and the right isn‘t. That‘s all it takes for evil to win.

        Change that!

        • pahlimur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          This is my point reiterated. I don’t like newsom either, but i would vote for him 1x10^100 if he were the candidate in the general. The “he is being normalized” shit is why the left loses all the time. Complain about him, but don’t assume enough centrists wont vote for him in the primaries for him to be the general candidate. I’m tired of people not voting, then bitching about the current administration.

          • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Wow you’d vote for Hitler (D) over Hitler (R/) you are very brave and smart.

            • pahlimur@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              The .ml is insanely consistent with being incredibly stupid. I wish I was comfortable being as dumb as you are.

              • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                23 hours ago

                So there is a line. You wouldn’t vote for Literally Hitler. Good Job! How about Trump (D)? In the 90’s a lot of democrats, including Dems you probably have voted for and supported online, loved Trump.

                How about a President (R ) who thinks that allowing the US to use Drones to kill anyone in the world as long as the CIA has a good reason to kill them is also ok? What if that were President (D)? Any issue there?

        • pahlimur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          And? Of course they are going to do this shit. Good people don’t rise against great evil, sort of evil people use it to slither into power.

      • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Newsom, the Zionist guy who likes destroying homeless people’s encampements for PR ain’t “great”. That’s quite an understatement.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Newsom would be Trump if he lived in Texas. If he is the Democratic nominee in 2028 then I personally am giving up on politics. I’ve been fighting for a better Democratic party for 40 years, and after all that they are worse than the Republicans were when I started. No, fuck that. Newsom would be the last straw for me. If he gets the nomination, there is no saving the country anyways.

        • pahlimur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          If I see you headed on a train to the camps I’ll make sure go give you a thumbs up while you roll by. Giving up is pathetic. Go dig your grave and don’t complain when they come for you.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Has 40 years of supporting corrupt Democrats saved us from the camps? It sure doesn’t look like it to me. Camps are proceeding right on schedule. That’s the whole point. At best the camps get put on hold for four years. At worst, they get diversity quotas for the guards.

              • Tinidril@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                Also, to be clear, Newsom would be the worst scenario with diversified guards. If you want a four year pause, nominate Pritzker. If you want to take the country back, don’t settle for the first personality MSNBC jiggles in front of your face three years out from the election.

                I remember all the uninformed Democratic normie voters creaming themselves over Andrew Cuomo’s Covid press conferences where he beat up Trump’s response constantly. I kept hearing he could be the one for 2020 until he disgraced himself. Now He’s allied with Trump and Trump’s Donors, and we can’t even get Schumer and Jeffries to support his Democratic opponent. And you think these people fight for you?

                Cuomo is Trump in a different package. More than for any other name being thrown around for 2028, so is Newsom. He’s a chameleon and a political opportunist. The only thing he hates about Trump is that he wants Trump’s chair.

                • pahlimur@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I will probably go Pritzker in the primary. But again, I’m not dumb enough not to fall in line during the general. I’ve been doing it since Hillary and regret not voting for Obama both times while I was still a registered republican. All choices on the dem ballot are better than a republican.

              • Tinidril@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Are you honestly telling me that you expect Newsom would roll back more than some cosmetic fringes of Trump’s immigration policy? Biden sure didn’t. You think Newsom is going to roll back Palentir and the surveillance state? Not a chance in hell.

                • pahlimur@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Will trump or the next republican do any of this either? You’re asking the stupidest question when the answer is staring you in the face.

      • Michael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        would have any chance in hell of winning

        …why do you believe that? Kamala was the opposite of radical and lost horribly to Trump.

        If anything, it’s worth trying to run on something progressive or otherwise substantive, since running on status quo policies doesn’t seem to be working.

        • zenitsu@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Kamala was the opposite of radical

          She wasn’t portrayed/perceived that way at all, you understand that right? You and everyone else with some political awareness might think that, but the magats and even a shitload of “centrists” (quotes because most have been captured by the magats without being aware) think she was radical.

          …why do you believe that?

          E.g. Bernie. The most milquetoast “radical” tested

          America only has an appetite for far right radicals atm, clearly.

          • Michael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            She wasn’t portrayed that way at all, you understand that right?

            Everybody knows that those on the far-right drip are trained to think everybody to the left of them (even a little bit) is a radical.

            Liberal mainstream media did not portray her that way at all.

            even a shitload of “centrists” (quotes because most have been captured by the magats without being aware) think she was radical.

            You’re likely referring to old-school Republicans/conservatives, and they either didn’t vote (because they are disenfranchised) or voted Trump, yes. Some may have voted Kamala, but not as much as she might have hoped (given her strategy to shift right).

            A significant amount of people don’t vote in this country and the Democrats aren’t interested in capturing that demographic, nor are they interested in capturing progressive or leftist voters.

            …and because they aren’t trying to appeal to anyone besides people who absolutely cannot abide by Trump, they lost and will likely continue to lose in the big elections if they don’t run on something to attract voters.

            E.g. Bernie.

            Who never got a chance in a general election because he got ratfucked 2x in a row by the Democratic Party et. al.

            The most milquetoast “radical” tested

            Bernie is the lesser evil here - he’s milquetoast, but not as milquetoast as e.g. Kamala, Biden, and Obama are to their corporate donors.

            Bernie was a good sport, but he has principles he stands by and that’s more than those folks could say now.

            • zenitsu@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Who never got a chance in a general election because he got ratfucked 2x in a row by the Democratic Party et. al.

              This is just major debunked cope. People seem to forget, but when Trump ran for the first time, the whole “establishment” hated him, both left and right. Hell, even the heritage foundation didn’t want him. Until he got too big to ignore, he won through sheer brute force popularity. Bernie just lost the primaries to Hillary…if you think America has any capability right now to see anyone to the left of Bernie in power, you’re just delusional.

              Current America would rather take an old bumbling corrupt criminal rapist(pedo too?) brainlet instead of a qualified intelligent prosecutor/AG because a woman of colour is a bit too much. Don’t make the mistake of thinking your niche is anywhere near the norm.