Summary

Former vice presidential nominee Tim Walz criticized Trump for economic chaos while taking personal responsibility for the situation during an MSNBC interview.

“We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d have won the election — and we didn’t,” Walz told Chris Hayes. He called Trump the “worst possible business executive” and praised the Wall Street Journal’s editorial criticizing Trump’s tariff war.

Walz emphasized Democrats must offer something better, not just criticize Trump. Recently, he acknowledged a leadership void in the Democratic Party and admitted spending too much time combatting Trump’s false claims about immigrants.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    “I think Americans have had it,” Walz explained. ”… Look, I own this. We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d have won the election ― and we didn’t.”

    Good to see someone from the campaign acknowledge “getting votes” was the campaign’s entire job, and losing the election is the fault of the campaign.

    I hope Walz runs in a competitive primary and gets the nomination.

    But if they try to just hand a baton off, we’re gonna see the same result.

        • Stern@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          7 days ago

          I feel like if Biden had stuck with something like, “I’m going to be one term and let some younger folks lead, we need some folks who are going to see the consequences of their actions running the show, not 70 and 80 year olds.” and had an actual primary, Harris wouldn’t have been the nominee and said nominee would have won. There’s a few other things that could have helped, but the short campaign was definitely a huge stumbling block.

          • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yes indeed, but also primaries can help to attract voters. I think the Sanders campaigns, though he didn’t win, made young people more likely to vote Democrat.

        • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          We did, in fact, have primaries. There were like 9 choices for the Democratic nominee in my state. Better challengers could have run but didn’t. Yes I know the DNC using funding to “encourage” or “discourage” but that doesn’t change the fact that challengers could have, and did, run in the primaries.

            • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              That is partially true. We the voters did not vote for Harris, but the Biden delegates who the primary voters sent to the convention did.

              • CarnivorousCouch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                Yeah, and Biden was old. Even before his obvious deterioration, there was always a chance he wouldn’t make it through the term and Kamala would have to step up. If you voted for Biden in the primaries and were NOT ready for a potential future of a Harris presidency, I don’t know what you were thinking.

          • Stern@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Primaries are kind of a moot point for the incumbent if they want to run again.

            Trump in 2020 had 2,549 delegates. The next closest was Bill Weld with 1.
            Biden in 2024 had 3,905 delegates. The next closest was uncommitted with 37.
            Obama in 2012 had 3,514 delegates. The next closest there was also uncommitted, with 72.
            Bush in 2004 had a clean delegate sweep of 2,509.

            • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Yep. But it’s generally (just learned that Florida and Delaware Democratic parties cancelled theirs in 2024) not because the state parties just reject any other names to be put on the primary ballot. But there’s still a lot of people saying there was no primary or that the DNC wouldn’t let any challengers run. Just generally misplaced anger that they didn’t have better Presidential candidates to vote for when the reality is that better people just chose not to run. Has there ever been a primary challenger beat the incumbent president for the nomination and then win the election?

              • Stern@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 days ago

                Has there ever been a primary challenger beat the incumbent president for the nomination and then win the election?

                There’d have to be a primary challenger who beat the incumbent first, and I don’t think that one has happened. I know Ted Kennedy got relatively close (Well, closer then the others I’ve mentioned, still blown out 1900 to 1200 delegates) to knocking out Carter on the Dem side, other then that, Reagan and Ford in 1976 was decided 1,121 to 1078 for Ford.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      NO! NO! NO!

      NOOOOOOO!

      Do not nominate Tim Walz you stupid assholes. He was the blue republican addon to make the progressive Harris campaign appeal to centrists and republicans. He wanted to “expand israel’s borders”. He was elected in a district that ran straight red like the blood of the innocence for a long time before he won it, and then he lost that district during the election.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        He was the blue republican addon to make the progressive Harris campaign appeal to centrists and republicans.

        The what Harris campaign?

      • forrcaho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        We have free public school lunches for all our kids here in Minnesota because of Governor Walz. How the fuck is that “blue republican”?

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          He might be further left than any republican but hes as far right as a Democrat can be. As I have said before I will vote for him, but I gurantee you millions of leftists won’t.

  • MisterOwl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    Nope. This is on Biden. It’s his fault Harris/Walz were put into an impossible situation.

    That senile old fuck was supposed to be a one-term president. If they’d spent 4 years planning for 2024 instead of sitting around with their thumbs up their asses maybe they could have run a winning campaign.

    But no, Joe was too proud or stupid or both to stick to that plan. This election was lost the instant he doddered his way on to the debate stage on 6/27/24.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        7 days ago

        Exactly, and it’s the third time we’ve been betrayed like this.

        Not going after the Bush administration.

        Not going after the subprime mortgage architects.

        Not going after Trump.

        Three times, they’ve had the easiest of layups for public approval of all time and they’ve consistently fucked it up.

      • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 days ago

        Amen. 4 years to build a case? January 6th, spend 6-12 months and file charges. What the fuck were they doing for 4 years?

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Or at least the second the supreme court said whatever the president does is legal as long as it’s an “official act”.

    • The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Lots and lots of balls were dropped. Garland didn’t get Trump in jail when he could have. Biden didn’t stick to only one term. A democratic candidate wasn’t really elected when Biden stepped down (for the record, I think that Harris was more than qualified, but a lot of people were upset that she was just “chosen”). Harris didn’t try to stand out and be her own candidate - she mostly just stuck with the status quo and never disagreed with Biden. Etc etc etc.

      • ExistentialKiwi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 days ago

        Warning bells started going off in my head the moment that the Democrats announced that Harris was going to be the candidate after Biden dropped out, not because I thought she was an unqualified candidate but because there was no time taken to search for other candidates. Maybe it was too close to the election to take the time to go through the rigamarole of all that but I think even a cursory effort to do so would have gone a long way towards making it feel like people’s opinions actually mattered. Biden dropping out was huge (at least to me) because it felt like an acknowledgement of the voters who had consistently felt like they were held hostage for their votes because the alternative was a fascist.

        It doesn’t help either that they went on to repeatedly shoot themselves in the feet while chasing moderate Republican votes, getting other prominent Democrats to chastise certain classes of voters and breeding the same voter apathy that hurt them in 2016, and their refusal to acknowledge that what’s happening in Gaza is a genocide that we shouldn’t help Israel perpetrate.

        • FilthyHookerSpit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          On your last point, I don’t think Dems could’ve done anything different. They’re clearly in Israel pockets and they can’t disobey their corporate overlords and run on a more progressive agenda. Only other option was to try hard to get the “centrists”. Incredibly disappointing as they would rather lose and go hard fascist rather than let their donors lose any money (how’s that stock market looking?).

    • Kalon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      A cascade of failures. Beyond Joe not man enough GTFO, the DNC once again anointed a letter instead of letting the public decide. yes, Joe should never have run for a second term. Given that he did, he should have dropped out sooner. Given that he didn’t, the DNC should have had an open convention rather than putting their thumbs on the scale in back room deals.

      Tim is 100% right that we would not be in this mess if they had won, but when is the DNC going to stop trying to manipulate everything and lie to us about it? They are to blame as much as Repugnacans.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Harris made choices. She could have chosen not to adopt every single one of Bidens policies. What was biden going to do, fire her? If you look back at her presidential run she really struggled to articulate any policies back then too.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      This is on anyone who was within arms reach of Trump in the last decade and didn’t take matters into their own hands.

  • GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Not you walz but the Democratic party. Send out 19 billion to Israel while our kids were hungry in school.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      He’s much more down to earth than the democratic establishment, or even Harris.

      At least, this is the vibes I’m getting.

      I don’t blame him, despite not knowing that much about him.

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    There’s no leadership void in the Democratic Party, it’s been Bernard Sanders for quite a while. Them denying this is to their (and everyone elses) detriment. Just run Bernie/AOC and let’s get this over with.

  • RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s so obvious the democratic party lied about Biden to get through the nomination phase and used the fact that the money already donated for the campaign was specifically to Biden or Harris and would not have easily been given over to any other new candidate. You do have to wonder, especially after how Trump was greeted by them, just what actually happened here. The fact is that the truth about Bidens condition should have been known, he should have decided not to run, and the Democratic party should’ve had a real primary for real candidates and new ideas. Tim Walz was as bad of a VP pick as Tim Kaine. The white guy as VP to shore up the right wing vote is a total myth. Biden was kind of the first one, then Tim Kaine, then Tim Walz. It just doesn’t work. Neither will Newsoms podcast attempt at finding common ground which he hopes will translate into moderate votes. Democrats really have no clue just how bad things are about to get…

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    The voters deserve a lot of blame here.

    You can lead a horse to water…

    Any ADULT can easily see that politicians are going to be imperfect, and no single candidate is going to align 100% with your stance. Demanding that they do, or else you’ll vote for literally the worst possible option, or sit out, or vote a “protest” vote, all so that someone, somewhere will “learn” something is just fucking childish and stupid. And this will be continue to be true no matter how many times the Tone Police show up to admonish people about blaming voters. Sorry, not sorry: I blame the voters.

    • Kayday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I agree, I’m also happy that people like Walz seem to want to give people a better option, making a protest vote even less appealing.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      I blame the voters.

      It means you never have to listen or change in any way, so of course you do.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        LOL, I am a voter. Are you under the impression that I have any direct influence over the Democratic Party? 🤣

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          LOL, I am a voter. Are you under the impression that I have any direct influence over the Democratic Party?

          According to your comment, voters are to blame, not the infallible holy party. So good work electing trump. It’s all your fault.

    • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Any ADULT can easily see that politicians are going to be imperfect

      The best I can do is fall for blatant Russian propaganda and then get mad when someone calls me out on it.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    Instead of frittering away the last few months of his presidential term, Biden should have just resigned and allowed Harris to take over his role. She could have pivoted way to the left without having to undermine Biden’s agenda and that would have really sent a clearer message to the democratic base.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      If voting patterns of America ever showed something consistently, it is the fact that shifting to the left in any sense never works. You can sometimes entice the public with enough vigor so they don’t focus on your politics, but outside of very rare cases, shifting to the right consistently brings some votes, and shifting to the left consistently brings loses.
      And no amount of social media posts was able to change it weirdly enough.
      It might have something to do with consistent anti-voting narrative of a lot of the vocal leftists, coupled with their bafflement that they consistently don’t get a desired outcome.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        If voting patterns of America ever showed something consistently, it is the fact that shifting to the left in any sense never works.

        Sounds like a great excuse to only move right.

  • maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I don’t blame Harris or Walz. I don’t even blame Biden, the senile old fool that he so clearly is.

    I blame the Americans for fucking up the most outrageously obvious binary choice in history.

    Has there ever been an election so obvious? Even during Trump vs Clinton one could almost be forgiven for giving Trump the benefit of the doubt as a “political outsider”, but by 2024 we knew exactly who this fucking guy was… The fact that people today are acting surprised and outraged about all the stuff that’s been happening during Trump’s first 1.5 months is only further proof that Americans are perhaps the dumbest amnesiacs to infest the Earth.

    Literally all we had to do was vote against Trump’s particular brand of fascism.

    But Americans are the type of people who fail a single question true or false quiz because they forgot to write their name at the top of the page, and we deserve to suffer the consequences of our collective stupidity over and over until it is bred out of us, or until our society falls. The American people allowed this to happen–and not just Trump, but everything bad that has happened over the course of American history.

    • Mandelbrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Nah it’s actually their fault. The fact that they lost when it was “the most outrageously obvious binary choice in history” shows how hard they fucked a lay-up.

    • laserm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      The good think about the 2024 US election was that the choice was obvious to everyone who paid the littlest attention; the bad thing was that Americans chose the wrong candidate anyway.