https://archive.ph/2WlhY paywall removed
It’s insulting how hard the Democrats are pushing a sex pest who killed people during Covid just because his primary opponent is a dem-soc. How can anyone make progress with ‘allies’ like these?
Good reason to vote for someone else.
The only reason I can think of for Clinton giving Cuomo support is that they must have shared a tween at some point in their past.
Dawgs Of A Feather
the Democrats are pushing a sex pest
Which one of them do you mean? Clinton or Cuomo?
who killed people during Covid
Ah ok, must be Cuomo. ALTHOUGH…do we REALLY know what Bill was up to in the forests of upstate New York in 2020? 🤔
LOL, fitting.
What, they couldn’t get Liz Cheney’s endorsement? These people are so out of touch…
they’re very much in touch. But only With donors.
Phew. I read that as with minors, and thought the narrative shifted to the other side.
With donors.
Especially AIPAC.
Quit the virtue signaling. Your choices are either a “sex pest” or Trump’s pet.
Bullshit. Zohran is right there, as are 3 other lesser (but still good) candidates
And it’s ranked choice voting.
Trump’s pet?
Eric Adam’s is Trumps corrupt pet.
It’s amazing that you can illustrate not only a lack of reading comprehension but also cannot count.
Can read just fine. The others aren’t worth mentioning because they won’t rank. So once again, sex pest or Trump’s pet? Because if you believe any of the others will make a dent, then you are one of those fucking idiots that cost Harris the election because of your “morals.”
This shit aged so well. It must feel so good to be so wrong.
I’m rather proud to be wrong. There might be hope yet in this fucked up country.
I mean, it’s an encouraging sign that they think this endorsement is necessary. Zohran must be doing well in internal polling.
A ton of their donors probably live in the city and would be directly affected. Even more of a reason to vote for him
It’s insulting how hard the Democrats are pushing a sex pest who killed people during Covid just because his primary opponent is a dem-soc. How can anyone make progress with ‘allies’ like these?
Honestly thought you were talking about Clinton here
Could be. I don’t know what Bill was up to during covid
Helping Seth Rogan craft a more obnoxious laugh
Democrats pretend to be progressive the way Republicans pretend to be Christian. Just a virtue signal that can be jettisoned the instant it becomes inconvenient to power.
If Dems are trying to actual progressive, it’s only in relation to Republicans.
I think most Dems try to appeal to actual conservative values. It’s non-intrusive, light on protections, nothing that might make the average voter uncomfortable (no reparations, no medicaid for all, no major police reform etc). They’re pretty vocal about it. It’s just that their opposition is fucking terrorists that hate most of their own country.
The political compass is wrong.
Democrats are centrist, conservative. Republicans are right wing, regressive.
The two sided layout is just no longer applicable, and labelling all right-wing crap as conservative is incorrect.
There is a blatant attitude of regressive notions, and it’s about damn time people call it out for what it is.
I mean that’s better, but you’re still ignoring several other axes
It’s never been a single continuum, and it’s not a quadrant. Your takeaway isn’t wrong, but there’s so many more options
I think most Dems try to appeal to actual conservative values. It’s non-intrusive, light on protections, nothing that might make the average voter uncomfortable (no reparations, no medicaid for all, no major police reform etc).
Well, yeah. That’s what liberalism is, and always has been.
Why would I care that a sex-pest endorsed a fellow sex-pest?
Shocking. Y’all, Clinton was doing speeches for Kamala’s campaign, which let’s be fr, couldn’t have helped, like at all. The party needs to take him out behind the shed lmao
Who even wants a Bill Clinton endorsement? I don’t live in NYC so it’s not something I’m going to have to deal with but who is thinking “Oh, the elderly sex pest endorsed him? That’s going to change my decision.”
All the voting Democrats that still haven’t read a history book and still think Clinton was the greatest president of their lifetime, and complete ignorance of how much him and his wife are directly responsible for ALL the deep shit we’re in today.
Between this and the times printing 3 anti Zohran articles it seems to me they’re trying to blitz low info voters to vote against not only Zohran but all the candidates more progressive then a literal sex pest who caused more senior death during covid than necessary.
Serial sexual harassers stick together
Another example: Bill Clinton officiated Anthony Weiner’s wedding
What about Carlos Danger’s?
He would.
It is on brand
Abusers stand together. We need more solidarity to stop them.
