So,

  1. What an absolutely bitch ass snowflake move.

  2. Well good luck with that and going to be funny when people are still pissed.

What a utter pathetic snowflake.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      “taxation without representation” I believe was a slogan, not a legally binding principle.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I get ya. It was a rallying cry for revolution, not really anything that ended up in writing as law.

    • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      Unless the town hall is paid for with taxpayer dollars or held on government property, it’s a citizen who happens to be in Congress having a private event with their political supporters.

      Same as a political party convention or fundraiser dinner,.AFAIK.

      (And, depending on state law, even a function on government property may be legally private.)

        • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 month ago

          So, how does it work? Does your state have a law requiring congressional “town halls” to be open to the public?

          • Malek061@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Town halls by their definition are open to the public. He is holding a private campaign event.

            He is lying to the public by calling it a town hall.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 month ago

              Or it is a town hall, and he’s lying to the public by claiming he’s allowed to exclude non-Republicans.

            • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              “town hall” is a style of event. Back when there were meaningful debates during presidential campaigns, it used to be a regular choice.

              I guarantee you that they were closed events, with attendees chosen legally-arbitrarily by whatever TV network was hosting the event.

              So long as he takes questions from those in attendance, it’s a town hall. Even if no cameras are allowed.

              • Malek061@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 month ago

                The public put their name in a hat and submitted questions for presidential debates. Those people were picked to speak. Still was open to everyone. This is not a town hall.

                • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I assure you that anyone who ever put on a town hall debate, including the League of Women voters and definitely the TV networks, screened the questions and reserved the right to exclude anyone they chose to.

                  No debate or political event since well before Nixon/Kennedy has been “open to everyone”.

      • Kaboom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Even on government property, there’s exceptions. Like a private study room at the library.

  • lectricleopard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m in a town hall rn. Waiting for it to start anyway. My rep is a dem, and guess what? No restrictions on attendees. Imagine that!