• PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      “But what if we compromised with them and our donors, and then compromised with the Republicans, and then put on our shocked pikachu face when the Republicans don’t compromise with us in turn???”

      Legit, the second half of the problem is related to our gerontocracy. These fucking dinosaurs are still acting like it’s the 1970s and 1980s, when they first came to power.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    MTG is just there for the lols. She was rich before she got elected and gotten even richer since. She’a there to pass out the matches and watch the world burn

  • the_tab_key@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    The GOP is all worked up about “antisemitism” but MTG sprays this garbage all over the place. The hypocrisy is painful.

  • bigFab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not that republicans are way worse at it, but democrats do much more than a sufficient job when it comes to bombing arab countries. No one can compete with Obama bombs or genocide Joe.

  • OnlyJabs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    AOC is not a good representation of the democrats. Obama, Biden, Pelosi, and Gavin Newsom are better reps for the party. With the things AOC values, it feels she only identifies as Democrat in order to be on the Democrat ballot. AOC has been touring with Bernie. Bernie doesn’t even identify with the Democratic Party, but still came dangerously close (according to the Dems) to being the elect instead of Biden back in 2019-2020. The Democratic Party did not like that. The dems want to keep the working class down. The republicans want to squash the working class and more into submission.

    I think the people that align with the Democratic Party were feeling a lot of this between late 2019 - mid 2020.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Obama, Biden, Pelosi, and Gavin Newsom

      Obama being a proponent of universal healthcare back in 2008, Biden a supporter of the Green New Deal, and Newsom part of a push for universal healthcare in Cali?

      I don’t mean to say that any of this is enough. I don’t mean to say that the Dems aren’t dragging their fucking feet and 10 years too late on every goddamn issue; I’m not saying that the system is working or that we don’t need a new system.

      But anyone who says that the two parties are the same or indistinguishable in terms of results or ideals is selling a crock of fascist-flavored shit. Apathy and non-participation benefits conservatives.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    These are wildly opposite and anyone who says AOC isn’t a real representation of DNC must also find a more GOP aligned member, like Mike Johnson or Steve Scalise. They are despicable but not all-caps-tweets kind of despicable.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    MTG is far more welcome in her party than AOC is in hers.

    The neoliberal DNC sees the Republicans as their esteemed opposition, as they are on the same take and have the same orders on Economic policy. They see spoilers like AOC, who are not on the corpo bribe train and for profound economic policy changes, as their enemy.

    https://apnews.com/article/business-nancy-pelosi-congress-8685e82eb6d6e5b42413417f3d5d6775

    https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/04/15/nancy-pelosi-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-481704

    The Democrats, almost all of them save a couple of spoilers, aren’t the fascists themselves, but they’ve spent the last half century enabling the fascists. The Democrats don’t care about entire industries of confidence schemes murdering Americans like our deathcare industry, they don’t care about poor kids getting a good education, and they dont care about millions of our most betrayed neighbors dying in the streets. As the bad cop Fascists brag about how much they love the schaudenfreude of the pain those people are in, the good cop neoliberals shrug “free market forces, sorry! But I do affirm your identity, homeless dying/lifesaving healthcare denied person!”

    That’s why there really isn’t hope until we collapse, hopefully by our hands in revolution and not by oligarch made climate change in a couple decades. Best, best, best, best case scenario, we have a real election in 3. 5 years and the Neoliberals gain power, do NOTHING to reign in the oligarchs, income inequity, or our sociopathic, murderous capital markets as they’re gleefully paid not to do. Fascism is the takeover of the state to serve big capital’s need for ever moar, and so the table will remain set to go back on the fascist march in just another 4 years.

      • Suite404@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Based on social media I have no fucking clue what I am. But I do know I’d like universal Healthcare and the right for people not just to survive on their working wages. But to thrive. No one should have to struggle for basic necessities and a decent life.

          • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Universal health care is antithetical to both market economies and economic freedom which are both core liberal principles. Liberals cannot actively support it without also confronting the inherent contradictions within liberal ideology.

            Unless you’re using the term “liberal” in the US sense of ‘anybody “left” of fascism’ in which case you’re statistically correct, but mostly due to generalization.

            • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Well how about this I DEFINATELY %100 do agree that capitalism has a fucking problem. I believe it makes more sense to regulate harshly and have a 50s style tax on the rich than to throw baby out with water. Im liberal in the sense that HUMAN RIGHTS must take precedent no matter what part of an economic shift we’re in

              • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Liberals cannot actively support it without also confronting the inherent contradictions within liberal ideology.

                Thank you, I couldn’t have asked for a better demonstration of this point. A healthcare system that is based on the free market but that is “regulat[ed] harshly and [with] a 50s style tax on the rich” is not universal healthcare!

                If you can see the issues with healthcare and can understand why universal healthcare would be a necesarry improvement then how are you still advocating for a free market solution for anything?

                That baby died a long time ago, and required required constant human rights violations to keep it alive in the first place. Getting rid of the bathwater won’t bring it back or make it require less cruelty to keep alive.

        • rational_lib@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I think the confusion is that it actually implies AOC, who is a Democrat, wants universal healthcare - she does.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    And yet when the legislature arrives to give us free Healthcare the Democrats don’t pass it despite having a majority.

    Both sides aren’t the same, but their choices produce the same results.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      And yet when the legislature arrives to give us free Healthcare the Democrats don’t pass it despite having a majority.

      Obamacare saved my life and was the product of immense effort at a time when the Dems were more conservative than they are today. Blue Dogs were wiped out in 2010 and 2012 because of that (correct) rage against them.

      You can say what the Dems managed to do was not enough - and it’s not. Millions of people are not as lucky as me (though I suppose poverty is a strange kind of luck - poverty in a blue state, perhaps, more appropriately) and still suffer immensely under our utterly fucked healthcare system. But it’s not the same result as doing nothing - or worse, handing control over to the GOP. Millions like me owe a greatly improved quality of life, or our very lives, to the reforms passed.

      If you have a plan to destroy the Dems and replace them all with left-wing progressives, and put demo charges on the base of our utterly fucked rat’s nest of a government structure, I’m not here to tell you not to. But I am here to tell you that both sides are not the same for millions of disadvantaged demographics, even if the Dems are not enough for those selfsame demographics.

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s really the one big thing I can think of that they did get through.

        It got like 80mil people health insurance which was great.

        It was still a huge compromise from the free universal healthcare that was the original goal.

        It’s worth noting that Obama did this by going around party leadership. Once he was in power he did not obey the DNC like other candidates have.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s worth noting that Obama did this by going around party leadership. Once he was in power he did not obey the DNC like other candidates have.

          I mean, the president is party leadership. And Biden, an ardent party loyalist, is the only Dem president in the past 50 years which has been in lockstep with the wider party.

          • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            When i say “the party” i mean the privately ran organization who is legally allowed to choose whoever their canidate is, and doesn’t have to legally hold a fair primary election or any election at all.

            Sure the president gets a temporary seat at the table, but the other DNC leaders do not want them to be in control.

            The fact that Obama tried to push free healthcare made the DNC leadership furious, because that isn’t what he told them before the primaries. But because they were stuck with him they instead had other loyalist dems try to help Republicans block his policies and then enjoyed the popularity Obama was bringing to the party.

    • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not the same results exactly, more that the dems enable the republicans by not pushing back, but both are far below the standard we should accept.

  • flandish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    4 days ago

    Both are capitalists and therefore both are, at their cores, against long lasting and realistic improvements for working class people.

    They both deserve prison.